What is a
good written history? Is it something dry and formal, laying out all
the potential facts in finite detail for the reader to make up their
own mind—an entire display of the known? Or is it an
interpretation and consolidation of potential facts into a likely
narrative? The former certainly more appealing to scholars and the
latter to casual readers, it rests in the hands of the writer at what
point in the spectrum they would like to approach the historical
material they are presenting. Let’s have a look at Buddy Levy’s
Conquistadores: Hernán
Cortés, King Montezuma, and the Last Stand of the Aztecs
(2008).
If
anything, Conquistadores
is a very focused work of history. More precisely, a tight look at a
major transitional moment for two cultures in one setting. Levy
begins the narrative just before Cortes arrives on modern day Mexican
soil, details the steps he took to subdue the Aztec nation, and ends
just after as New Spain is established. Levy fills in relevant
details as they affect the steps of this transition, but by and large
it’s a streamlined history of action-reaction, situation-decision,
and opening-outcome, like a story. Another way of putting this is:
one man’s dogged determination to take a nation for himself under
the name of god and king.









