What is there to write that hasn’t
already been written about George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four? Like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, the
novel’s ideas proved so fundamental they have become idiomatic in the English
language. ‘Big Brother’, ‘Thought
Police’, ‘Orwellian’, and to some extent ‘doublethink’ and ‘2+2=5’, are
expressions most are familiar with and part of everyday speech. Given the depth political and social
realities are delved into in realistic, eye-opening fashion, it’s an
understatement to write Nineteen Eighty-four is one of the most
significant works of science fiction to have been written.
Ignore the title; Nineteen
Eighty-four is not an attempt at futurology. Intended as a cautionary, the book is the story
of Winston Smith, an ordinary government worker living in unordinary
circumstances. His job to revise history
per orders from above, Smith’s life is filled to the brim with cameras,
listening devices, and government snitches trying to maintain a status quo that
is anything but free. The Party’s
totalitarian regime—generally nicknamed ‘Big brother’ by citizenry—monitors
nearly all aspects of life, including work, home, even people’s love
lives. Beyond voyeuristic, Smith et
al must watch their every move lest the most minor of statutes or laws be
broken. The Thought Police watching and waiting, most offenders are dragged
away, never to be seen again. Smith’s
days filled with anxiety and dread as he trudges from work to home, meeting the
enigmatic Julia one day moves life in new directions. But is Big Brother watching?
Though many mistake Nineteen
Eighty-four for a work in defiance of socialism or communism, the novel is
in fact a book of anti-totalitarianism, fascism, Stalinism, and any other –ism
or form of tyranny that subverts individual freedom for blanket control by an
oppressive leadership. Published in
1948, a time which recently bore witness to the fall of two despots (Hitler and
Mussolini) and the rise in power of three more (Stalin, Franco, and Mao
Zedong), Orwell’s concerns in the novel stray far from the ideologies
propounded by Engels and Marx. Cleverly
imagined, the scenario Orwell depicts—the complete devaluation of life and the
subsequent breaking of the human spirit through fear of the government—is
almost palpable. The terror of living in
such a controlling authoritarian regime may perhaps be the single most striking
element of the novel.
Orwell perhaps better known for his
non-fiction at the time of Nineteen Eighty-four’s publication, the book
benefits greatly from his straightforward, journalistic approach. Smith’s life described in the most direct of
terms, the fictional setting of Oceania comes across as cold and bleak. Like non-dramatized reporting, the tough
living conditions, the eye-over-the-shoulder, the details of evading Big
Brother and the Thought Police, and the sterility of Room 101 are described in austere
and affective detail. Narrator voice
never intruding, social and political terms are expressed via the story rather
than direct to the reader. This approach
not only creates a realistic view of Oceania in the mind’s eye, but renders
Smith’s plight all the more poignant in both personal and social terms.
In the end, Nineteen Eighty-four
is the most realistic look at life under a technology-enhanced, totalitarian
regime ever written. Given that the technology
Orwell imagines is drawing closer to reality every day (witness London
streets), his vision increases in value as both a warning regarding, and
reminder of, the value of individual freedom with each passing day. Investing every ounce of social and political
nuance he gained from journalistic work (e.g. Homage to Catalonia and Down
and Out in Paris and London) with socio-technical ideas that only prove
themselves more prescient, you owe it to yourself to read this piece of human
history that speaks to the present with a stronger voice each day. It’s impossible to walk way unaffected.
1984 is the book that got me into politics and philosophy. What if you are robbed of freedom in the name of patriotism? What a remarkable achievement!
ReplyDeleteAgreed! And another is, what is a good balance point between state intervention and individual freedom? After all, the Wild West conjures up different images for different people: for some a time of opportunity and exploration, and others a time of lawlessness and uncertainty... :)
DeleteThanks for your interesting thoughts on 1984. I read this book when I was around 15 - back when "dystopia" was a new concept to me. (Back when YA dystopias weren't popular like they are now!) I think I missed a lot of the subtleties. Every once in a while I see a review (like yours) that reminds me that I ought to try the book out again. I bet I'd like it a lot more...
ReplyDeleteYA dystopia? I'm clueless as to this sub-genre. Is it really so... burgeoning?
DeleteI really must recommend "Kallocain" (1940), by poet Karin Boye (1900-1941).
ReplyDeleteBest regards from Mats Paulsson