Time travel
is one of the most well-known, worn motifs in science fiction. Ripe with potential for interesting
paradoxes, clever entertainment, and impossible scenarios catering to
melodrama, numerous works have employed the motif. It’s fair to say, however, Algis Budrys’ 1975
novella The Silent Eyes of Time is
the only to approach the concept from a purely corporate point of view.
The Silent Eyes of Time is the story of the
ageing corporate consultant Clinton Gallard and his assistant, Elizabeth
Farrier. Called off the plane he’s about
to board at the start of the story, the reason is more interesting than he
could have imagined: a scientist working at his company has discovered time
travel. The future the single option,
and four years the maximum, the scientist has brought back coins and a
newspaper to prove his travels are real.
But more than just news, Gallard and Farrier have been recalled from
their business trip to organize the company’s response. Desiring nothing more than to protect their
assets and intellectual property, it’s up to Gallard to coordinate the cover
up.
Though
some may describe the story as dated, given Budrys intentionally sets the story
in 1971 (i.e. four years prior to when the story was published), the novella
takes on a historical aspect. Though the
counter-culture movement was in full-swing, there are still strong traditional
values present. The role of women,
limited communication technology, and the style of corporate management all
combine to create a scenario difficult to pull off in today’s technological
environment, locking the novella in a time capsule of day’s past. What remains unchanged is the sentiment.
As can be
expected given such an introduction, The
Silent Eyes of Time is smoldering commentary on corporate interests. Inhuman to say the least, Budrys’
presentation of the manner in which companies prey upon their employees, not to
mention seek to monopolize and isolate the technology brought into existence
under their control, has bite. The
parallels drawn between discovering time travel in the story and the discovery
of ground breaking technology in the real world is extraordinarily relevant
when considering the technology available compared to that which is produced
for consumers. The metals used in
today’s cars are actually designed to break down to keep the economic wheels
greased rather than using existent yet protected technology of higher
quality. Paranoid and disassociating,
the lengths Gallard goes to keep the discovery under wraps becomes even more surprising
given a certain condition that is unveiled toward the end of the story.
In the
end, The Silent Eyes of Time is a
solid novella that critiques the manner in which corporations handle technology
emerging from their research labs, specifically the people involved and the
ramifications for society. Budrys writes
in a dense hand heavy on dialogue that smacks of the era, but strikes at a
sentiment that has only evolved rather than diminished. Time travel in fact a background element,
those looking for another The Time Machine, The End of Eternity, or The Anubis Gates will be disappointed by
Budrys’ novella, but should, perhaps, pay attention.
Sadly, Rogue Moon was not up to par. I guess it's popular for highlighting the shift in SF from concept-based plots to a character-based plot, but long soul-revealing monologues aren't exactly a deft touch at characterizing so-called "real" humans. Aside from that, I still have to mull over some parts.
ReplyDeleteI tried to find the post on your blog in which you mentioned Budrys' reviews, but I couldn't remember which book it was in regards to... So, I'm replying here.
DeleteI've read that Rogue Moon is his most commercial work, so I'm not surprised that you are disappointed. Popularity does not automatically equal quality. I believe in my comment on your blog I mentioned his novel Who?. Before you dismiss Budrys entirely, try it. It's precisely as you describe in your comment above: a character-based plot that uses its concepts as a platform rather than main premise. But there are no soul-revealing monologues - that I can remember, and I think the plot is structured rather nicely... But I'm sure you have lots of other books on your to-read pile... :)
We were discussing Disch's novel The Genocides and how Budry totally dismissed the book as "unrelieved trash, ineptly written, pretentious, inconsistent and sophomoric"... words I would save for his Rogue Moon. I'm interested in his other work, so I'm far from dismissing him entirely. And yes, there are lots of other books and so many book sales.
ReplyDelete