The time
and place for scientific investigation and the time and place for letting
nature run its course is an ethical intersection becoming increasingly
prominent in modern society. Stem cell
research: beneficial to humanity, or a violation of human rights? Cloning: a way to the future, or a
mega-problem waiting to burst? Animal
testing: necessary, or cruelty? Two
hundred years ago the questions were more basic but no less profound. Pat Murphy’s 1990 novella Bones explores one of these questions:
should a corpse be put to use by medical science, or laid to rest peacefully?
Bones is the semi-biographical account of two men,
Charlie Bryne and John Hunter, both real personages from history, and opens
with the story of Bryne’s conception.
The size of an adult by age 10 and more than eight feet tall by the time
he’s twenty, his father is a man of Irish legend—a heritage that Bryne’ mother
instills in him as the massive youth grows older. Ever increasing numbers of Irish leaving for
London, Bryne, after meeting an English cardsharp, heads to the big city to
join them, his mission to bring the Irish back to their homeland. Living in London at the same time is the
renowned surgeon and anatomist John Hunter.
Grave robber by night and scholar by day, Hunter spends his days investigating
cadavers with an eye to the bizarre. It is thus running into Bryne’s eight foot
frame on the street one day that his interest is piqued, and the two form a
tentative friendship. Each man with
different aims, the resolution of their situation is softly intense.
In Bones, Murphy uses supernatural elements
and an idyllic version of Ireland to expand the perception of Bryne as a gentle
giant. Leaving his sword behind in
Ireland, the staff he takes with him is used to heal and help the Irish he
encounters in London’s dirty streets, rather than rally the troops to rebellion
and war. The ploy successful, upon the
conclusion of Bryne’s tale (available here for
those who prefer the real story) a few heart strings are tugged.
Hunter
portrayed as cold and calculating, Murphy hints at an associated agenda, but
never openly states it. The reader is
led to sympathize with Bryne, but for what reason? Is science evil? Do the bones of the dead have a right to
peace in the ground or purification through fire? Were Hunter, and those who came after him,
right in what they did to benefit science?
For me,
however, the core of the story hinges on Bryne’s deterioration—the only transitory
point open to discussion. Did the
bleakness of London break Bryne’s heart, or was it his own inability to control
his drink? Murphy seems to spin the
story in one of those directions, but such an approach would do a lot of
sweeping dirt under the rug to give things the appearance of cleanliness. But this may be a personal quarrel: if the
aim is real world commentary, it behooves the writer to present facts. I digress, as regardless whether the Bryne’s
personal problems are glossed over distracts little from the major quandary:
scientific progress vs. peace in death.
In the
end, Bones is a well-written novella
(Murphy’s prose is at almost all times liquid smooth) that never officially
chooses sides on the victim question but does seem to hint it favors one over
the other given the shadings and subtle digs.
Ireland painted as a rustic idyll and London as a pit of greed and
squalor, I also can’t help wondering if there was a cultural agenda, as well,
but with no obvious reason, I have to give Murphy the benefit of the
doubt. (A side note, Hilary Mantel
purloined Murphy’s idea with her novel The Giant, O'Brien, which may be of interest to those who
loved Bones.)
No comments:
Post a Comment