Semi-quotidian
human lateralness (with shades of destruction).
That is the (admittedly oblique) plaque on the wall beneath David Mitchell’s 1999 debut novel
Ghostwritten. A fusion of multi-cultural flavors, it spans
the globe, stretching from everyday soul to soul, telling stories that
culminate in something approximating an encompassing vision—if you squint. The authorial voice striking, the prose
bounces and burns across the spectrum of individuals—not always in parallel
with circumstance, but certainly with verve.
Clever
(occasionally too clever for it own good), Ghostwritten
is a rich meal of a novel with the occasionally empty but enjoyable
calorie. Using an uncommon approach to
novel form, Ghostwritten is less a
single narrative and more a mosaic of everyday peoples’ stories. Connected via chance and those quirkly little
circumstances that throw strangers together, the people are far from heroes and
villains. The element of chance only a
part of the premise, Mitchell seems more intent on using the device to tell the
fate of ordinary people in the context of violent history, that is, rather than
rubbing the idea of fate itself in the reader’s face. I am only partially convinced the nine
stories flow into a singular, coherent whole, but then again, life does not
allow us that, either.
On the
surface, and as is common with short story collections, some of the individual
stories will appeal to the reader, and others less so. Burning in my memory still are the young
Japanese man working in the jazz shop, the NYC radio dj, and the drummer cum
ghost writer cum womanizer living in London.
Their stories delivered in a tone that cuts straight to the heart of
their characters or situation, they stand strong on their own as much as they
are a piece of a whole. A chain seeming
the inappropriate analogy, some peoples’ stories are connected linearly, while
others are through history or mere circumstance.
And
Mitchell does play a little fast and loose with tough moments from
history. Moving between manipulative and
relevant, the Japanese sarin gas bomber is rendered in simplistic but
believable enough terms, while the Chinese tea house owner experiences the
sharpest knives that have cut down Chinese people the past century, and is even
embarrassing at times for its ease. The
embarrassment more a function of tone (i.e. the proceedings are rendered more
satirical than dramatic or “serious” due to the jocularity of the narrative
voice), it’s time to address perhaps the most singular aspect of Ghostwritten: authorial voice.
Boisterous
a word beginning to describe Mitchell’s writing, there are moments of sheer
brilliance, all else playful, likable, very approachable in the moment.
You’re listening
to Night Train FM on the last day of November, 97.8 ‘til very late. That was
‘Misterioso’ by Thelonius Monk, a thrummable masterpiece that glockenspiels my
very vertebrae. Bat Segundo is your
host, from the witching hour to the bitching hour. Coming up in the next half-hour we have a gem
from a rare Milton Nascimento disc, ‘Anima’, together with ‘Saudade Fez Um
Samba” by the immortal Joao Gilbero, so slug back another coffee, stay tuned
and enjoy the view as the night rolls by! My Batphone is flashing, we have a
caller on the line. Hello, you are live on Night Train FM.”
A first
novel, however, there are moments Mitchell’s prosaic exuberance overwhelms any
intent. “I watched the lime fizz in my bottle of Sol. A parrot’s pancreas
pickled in piss.” And this gem:
“…The bloody machine swallowed my card and told me to
contact my branch. I said something like
‘Gah!’ and punched the screen. What’s
the point of Yeats if you can’t buy a few rounds?
A round Indian
lady behind me with a magenta dot on her forehead growled in a Brooklyn accent,
‘Real bummer, huh kid?’
Before I could
answer a pigeon from the ledge above crapped on me.”
Both are
excellent examples of the occasional purpling in delivery. Ghostwritten
brilliantly written, ok, but it is more than once an uncontrolled brilliance.
As
Mitchell is such a better writer than so many hacks published today, I don’t
feel right making these comments, but it must be said: the wildly delightful
prose causes some additional problems.
Each of the nine stories is intended to feature a distinct voice, and by
default, story. And indeed, each begins
in a singular tone. But all too quickly
Mitchell’s own enthusiasm leaks through, rather than the character’s. Word by word the prose enjoyable, it is not,
however, always complementary to mood, nor does it continually reflect the
disposition of scene or setting. In some
of the stories, the musician and radio dj, for example, Mitchell’s voice works
near flawlessly. With the tea house
lady and art thief, however, the intended somberness is all too often perked up
by Mitchell’s energy, resulting in an undecided, and therefore botched
ambiance. This uncontrolled mode of
expression ultimately leaves the novel hanging on the fence in terms of whether
or not it is a unified voice, or many voices.
In the
end, Ghostwritten is a marvelous
debut novel that occasionally trips over its own shoelaces racing out the door,
but by and large announces a very promising new writer on the scene. The major theme of the novel seemingly the
unwritten stories of people affected by dramatic history, Mitchell goes one
step further to connect his social vignettes with butterfly-effect logic. Containing light elements of science fiction
and fantasy, the overall focus remains human, a facet the high-spirited prose
quells and propels, yet cannot diminish.
No comments:
Post a Comment