Robinson pretty much wrote the book on Martian terraforming
(ha!), and by that same token Aurora may
very well be the greatest generation starship story ever told. Touching, pertinent, purposeful, epic,
realistic, passionate, responsible, important—all seem adjectives suitable to the
novel, up to and including, perhaps, being Robinson’s best ever. (When I’ve finished his oeuvre, I’ll get back
to you on this one; only a few more to go.)
It’s the late twenty-eighth century and mankind has sent a
massive ship to the Tau Ceti system. Generations
having lived and died in space, they are approaching the twenty-year
homestretch it will take the ship to slow from the 0.1 lightspeed it’s been traveling
to drop in orbit. Freya, one of the 2,122
passengers living in a complex system of biomes attached like spokes around a
central spine, is in her late teens and seeking direction in life. Going on a wanderjahre, she moves in and out
of the biomes, encountering differing cultures and climates, friends and
landscapes, before choosing her path.
Once arriving at Tau Ceti and its planets and their moons, Freya and the
others find a planetoid with features relatively suitable for human life, and
set about exploring the surface. Things
go well at first. They make landfall
successfully, temporary camps are set up, and rudimentary infrastructure is put
in place in preparation for moving more of the host waiting onboard to the
surface. But a subtle disaster strikes,
and before the passengers know it, they face a decision their hopes never
dreamed.
To go into more detail of Aurora would certainly destroy what is a plot revealed behind veil
after veil. Opening on a soft moment of
drama and closing on an equally soft yet magnificently suggestive ending,
everything that happens between defies reader expectation one event at a time. The story satisfying, it is perhaps in
ideology that Aurora is most
surprising, however.
Arthur C. Clarke’s The City & the Stars is a strong statement that the stars are mankind’s
destiny; obstacles of all sizes may appear, but we are meant to inhabit lands
beyond our solar system the novel’s senitment.
Aurora should therefore be
considered prologue to The City & the
Stars. The obstacles, like those
Indian people and others are facing in our world today, are getting life straight
on Earth before attempting life on other planets. A paean to our planet, for all its burrs and
gnarls, Aurora slowly pulls its drawstring
tighter around the notion that the third planet from the sun is humanity’s home
and should be the beacon lighting our radars before any others are sought out.
It should be stated clearly at this point that Robinson is
not anti-space or anti-science, merely a realist; uber-trillion dollar ships to
the stars should not come at the expense of quality of life on Earth. At one point in Aurora a person states “That
a starship could be built, that it could be propelled by laser beams, that
humanity could reach the stars; this idea appeared to have been an intoxicant.”
And later, solidifying the notion, another adds that starships “were rare, being expensive, with no return
on investment; they were gestures, gifts, philosophical statements.” Aurora
thus indirectly raises awareness regarding environmental degradation, disease,
psychological issues, starvation, water shortage, and a myriad other problems
plaguing humanity on Earth. Where Clarke insists that man’s destiny is space, Aurora does not refute it, rather
suggests one step back: look before you leap.
But what makes Aurora perhaps Robinson’s best novel to date
is a key narrative layer: the narrative itself.
From
Couch to Moon calling its construction “part
of the journey,” Robinson asks his novel to be read for both plot,
theme, as well as the meta level of narrative creation. The ship’s AI learns how to construct a story
narrative as much as the reader absorbs the lessons it learns, including and
excluding information key to the ship’s passage through space. Thus where Gene Wolfe’s superb Book of the Long Sun looks at the mythopoeic
level of generation starship travel, Aurora
asks the reader to make the analog contemporary—to look at the narrative of
humanity itself, and see where it’s going, and, where it should go.
In the end, Aurora
is about as timely and important a novel as the genre can produce. In an age where much of science fiction is
focused on post-apocalytpic settings—as if giving up on the idea of civilized
life itself, Aurora asks us to
reexamine matters before they reach that point, to meditate on what is truly
important to us as a whole, and, in the very, least appreciate what we have
here on Earth. This review may be
getting a touch trite, but days after finishing the novel such thoughts and
emotions still linger. For certain a
contender for best sf novel in 2015…
How on Earth (ha) did I miss this? I kept wondering when you would post your review. Great, as always. My thoughts and emotions from Aurora still linger, too. The construction, and the shared process of the construction, is a work of art: inspired, intentional, and complete. I finally listened to his interview on Coode St the other day, and he is just fascinating to listen to. I can't imagine that he'll ever surpass the narrative success of this one, and I'm not sure I would want him to. It sounds like his next book will be lighter, like 2312.
ReplyDeleteHis new book (Green Earth) sounds to me it will be more like his Science in the Capital series, with an Earth-based examination of economics and lack of outer space stuff. But I could have missed something in the interview. If I'm right, I do hope he is able to come up with something more cohesive. I love KSR for being KSR, but the Science in the Capital series felt a bit forced, like he was trying too hard to fit good ideas together in a way that wasn't always organic. Regardless, I will read it. Interestingly, some publication lists have Green Earth coming out November this year. Two books in one year, I would be surprised.
DeleteThe book *is* anti-space colonization. The very act of colonization is described as narcissistic. There is a scene where Aurora punches a guy for saying the human race wouldn't stop colonizing the stars. And in a since, it is anti-science. In the book, each generation suffers an IQ drop in relation to the previous generation (which probably due to galactic cosmic radiation). His solution-don't leave the Earth and be a good little planeteer and take care of your Mother Earth because humans can never adapt to life outside of the loving womb of our "mother" and science will never find the answer and shouldn't even try.
DeleteWell, that's an extreme view. I daresay Robinson was more interested in priorities, namely let's fix the problems on Earth before we tackle living in space. And what would be part of the solution to fixing life on Earth? Science.
ReplyDelete