Published in 1948, Against
the Fall of Night is Arthur C. Clarke’s first ever novel. Dissatisfied with the outcome, a few years
later Clarke returned to the story and extensively revised it. Warranting a new title, he took the original
concept and tweaked, expanded, and plugged gaps, producing The City & the Stars in 1956.
(It should be of interest to readers that the initial Against the Fall of Night was not
replaced by the revised version but has remained in print in parallel, and is
perhaps worth looking into if the general idea is interesting.)
Some may say science fiction, some may say fantasy, but the
bottom line is that categorization of The
City & the Stars is unimportant.
No matter the forces at play—magic or technology—the story is one that
is ideological and independent of the details.
Of greater focus are the time scales at work, the history that has lead
to the Earth being in the situation it is, the value of avoiding stagnation
through forward thinking, and man’s relationship with the great beyond. The spec-fic candy is all there, it just
takes a backseat to the questions Alvin is attempting to answer. Who is Alvin?
Well…
Alvin is a young man ready for transition to being a
recognized adult of Diaspar. Diaspar a city millions of eons in perpetual
existence, the circular perimeter is enclosed in impenetrable glass and its ten
million citizens live a post-scarcity existence. They invest their time in art, research, or
whatever hobby they desire before the completion of their lives, and are
eventually placed back into the Central Computer to await “resurrection” in a
new body at some time in the future decided upon by the city’s overarching
artificial intelligence. His friends and
family distantly aware of their past existences, Alvin lacks this former
knowledge and seeks, most often through his tutor Jeserac, to discover his
roots. Despite the wealth of knowledge
and the perfection of life surrounding him, the truth, however, remains
maddeningly distant. In order to find
it, Alvin, along with the Jester Khedron, dares to challenge the system.
As might be intuited, The
City & the Stars contains elements of a bildungsroman. But there is much more. Alvin’s quest for knowledge, and the places
it takes him, both past and present, showcase mankind’s unquenchable desire to
further themselves; to know the underlying reason for the phenomena that is
life, no matter the form. All men look
at the stars in wonder, but getting there requires more than individual effort. It is thus possible to read the novel as a
voice in support of such cooperation and humaneness. Clarke may ignore the indelicate side of
humanity, but he does strikes upon something fundamental to our existence. (For
its confirmation of the belief humanity will continually evolve in a positive
direction to space, The City & the
Stars can be considered a prelude to 2001:
A Space Odyssey.)
Clarke also plays with religion in the novel—at least,
perhaps. In many ways Diaspar is a
version of Christian heaven. Existence
eternal and perpetually unchanged, there are no ugly people, a person may
indulge themselves in whatever manner they please, and the worst fate awaiting
anyone is to be taken from the populace, uploaded into mainframe, and manifested
at some time in the future. By
presenting a young man who wants more than material perfection, it’s possible The City & the Stars is one of
Clarke’s more subversive novels.
If there are faults to the novel, one would certainly be the
simplistic presentation of character.
But that The City & the Stars
is more mythic rather than human in tone, it’s also possible to forgive. Clarke was aiming at something fundamental
and only the b-movie dialogue betrays him.
All else regarding style is typical of Clarke: he will not win any
awards for prosaic beauty, but you do get a narrative that unravels
effortlessly and does all the little things right.
Continuing with the complaint department, as with most
societies Clarke envisions, things are always a little too perfect. The people of Diaspar take their existence
for granted, nary a rebel among the 10 million.
In communities elsewhere, science and pastoral life mix harmoniously,
not a drop of unaccepted poverty or dissent in the group. Alvin himself is the
hero’s hero, not a step taken out of place, and luck, par for the course. While
such presentation can be overlooked given the other details Clarke provides,
something remains lost.
In the end The City
& the Stars is rather atypical Clarke (but not wholly) that is well
worth a read. For its anthropological
forays, the book bears comparison to the works of Ursula Le Guin. For the discussion on what lies beyond, perhaps
the works of H.G. Wells, Olaf Stapledon, or Stanislaw Lem might float to
mind. But for its optimistic presentation
of man’s relationship with things beyond Earth and the need to reconcile the
past and present for the future, it is all Clarke. Just shy of being as good as some of his
other novels, The City & the Stars
is nevertheless one of the best the writer produced.
"Clarke may ignore the indelicate side of humanity ... its confirmation of the belief humanity will continually evolve in a positive direction to space ..."
ReplyDeleteIn order to be optimistic about mankind evolving into a space-faring species, it may, perhaps, be necessary to overlook mankind's "indelicacies." I'm reminded of C.S. Lewis's objection (voiced in his Space Trilogy) to our becoming a space-faring race: we will fill the Deep Heavens with the same evils we've filled the Earth with.
For lack of a better idiom, there indeed is more than one way to skin a cat. Some works, like Pohl & Kornbluth's The Space Merchants foreground mankind's foibles as obstacles necessary to overcome before the stars can be achieved, while others, like Clarke, prefer to present it carrot and stick style, forever dangling the dream of space right in front of our noses so we don't lose sight. Interestingly, there is a third: Kim Stanley Robinson's approach. His Mars trilogy presents both the virtues and vices of humanity intertwined on its road to life beyond Earth. If I thought harder, perhaps there are more...
DeleteI have not read the Space Trilogy. What's its hook, if any?
I'd say its hook is its cosmology. Though set in Lewis' own time, it's a deliberate throwback to the medieval thought-world where all things have both a natural and a supernatural aspect. Fascinating.
ReplyDelete