I grew up in a very rural area. (Population of my township—not quite town—was
450.) White collar jobs essentially
limited to doctors in the regional hospital, bank execs, and the occasional, lucky
entrepreneur (all in the next town over), the majority of people are salt of
the earth: laborers, teachers, mechanics, clerks, farmers, housewives, shop
owners, the elderly, etc. And, like so many
other small towns (and townships) in the latter part of the 20th and beginning
of the 21st century, my area is affected by poverty and higher usage of illegal
drugs. A close relative of mine, in
fact, died of an overdose recently.
Believing I had an understanding of why, I nevertheless jumped at the
chance to read Nick Reding’s Methland:
The Death and Life of an American Small Town (2009) to find out just how
country music, big truck tires, and a low-key sense of howdy could be so
affected.
A mix of case study and research journalism, Methland grounds itself in the
empiricism of small town of Oelwein, Iowa, all the while connecting the dots of
the town’s meth problem to the larger sectors of pharmaceuticals, criminal law,
sociology, and politics. From the town’s
mayor to one of its biggest addicts, the police chief to one of the region’s major
dealers, Mexican drug cartels to government legislation, FBI officials to the
owner of Oelwein’s most popular watering hole, the key players locally are
given space to present their view, even as research into the breadth and history
of meth legislation, distribution, manufacture, logistics, drug labs, and other
vectors are presented at the local, national and international levels. In short, Reding cannot be accused of leaving
a stone in the arena of methamphetamine abuse, unturned.
And comprehensiveness is what makes Methland not only informative, but satisfying. Rather than limiting himself to any
preconceived notions, or simplifying blame to one viewpoint, Reding attempts to
paint the wider scene based on his interviews with people and time spent in
statistics and newspaper articles. The result feels like a realistic look at
the issue, made all the more tangible by the people living the problem. Thus, for those concerned Methland is a bleeding heart liberal
account attempting to present meth heads as victims of the system, fear not: the
addicts and dealers of Oelwein are portrayed with the same sense of quotidian
realism as the police chief and district attorney. Certainly there are criticisms, poverty, human
vice, and lack of corporate social responsibility chief among them, but the meth
heads are not generally portrayed as helpless in the face of big business. The understanding and sub-text go
deeper.
I wanted a relatively comprehensive, palatable perspective
on the drug problem in rural America, and in the end, I got it with Methland. Enlightening in numerous ways, not to mention
relatable in a human-to-human fashion a lot of faceless journalism does not
deliver (save sappy human interest stories), Methland seems an honest attempt to quantify the meth problem and
its effect on society from someone who grew up in a small town and is sad to
see it impacted to the extent it is.
And, if for nothing else, documents the increasing gap between America’s
golden years and the present tense, and the people and sectors of society and
government involved in the decline.
No comments:
Post a Comment