As
most avid readers are aware, there are different novels for different
moods and different occasions. We have the term ‘beach read’ for
a reason, just as much as a quiet evening in bed with a glass of wine
is a good time to really dig into a book—not story, novel, tale,
but book. One that initially seems could be read for entertainment
given the steady headway, cogent imagery, and erratic bursts of
energy but in fact requires reflection to put the pieces together and
examine what lays under the surface, Anna Kavan’s Ice (1967)
is a fine marriage of art and enjoyment, bed and beach.
In
form, Ice is a triangle of characters that perpetually
discombobulates itself while the world is slowly engulfed by a
blanket of ice. An unnamed narrator pursuing an unnamed young woman
protected by a man called the Warden, the trio move and shift across
a landscape that is evolving underfoot due to the oncoming wall of
ice and the socio-political climate of war it is driving ahead of
itself. The narrator drawing ever closer to the woman as
eco-disaster looms, it’s only a question of mindset whether he can
hold on to his desire long enough.
As
Jonathan Lethem writes in his introduction, the prose of Ice
is at all times lucid and clear. And yet, the heart of the novel is
anything but transparent. Given Kavan’s personal issues with
heroin, not to mention the recurring imagery of white dust (ice), the
reader is wont to read Ice as an allegory for addiction and
the internal struggles of desire and escape. And it’s entirely
possible; the pieces fit. But it’s likewise possible the novel can
be superimposed over larger objects. For as ping-pong as the unnamed
narrator’s actions become over the course of the novel, he never
loses his humanity. Chasing some combination of his imagination and
reality, for as erratic as his actions are, they are focused in
reaction. Formed and structured like an early Ballard novel, Kavan
focuses on his goals while the world shifts and changes around him.
But
while the Ballard comparison is clear, I daresay Aldiss has it right
that Kafka forms the stronger parallel. Where Ballard uses his
scenarios to dig into the psyches of his characters, trying to find
the fundamental cables and wires, nuts and bolts that hold the thing
together under duress, Kavan, instead, uses the psyche as only one of
her tools. External elements (beyond the catastrophe of setting)
prove just as influential, if not directional. If Ballard’s early
novels are inward facing, Ice is certainly bilateral; factors
in the external world Ballard’s characters by in large avoid or
stand tall, whereas Kavan’s unnamed protagonist wants only to
interact. This becomes most clear when one finds Ballars characters
responding to concrete elements or changes in their environment.
With Kavan’s, there is a desire to possess, to reach out to own
those elements despite the growing chaos of catastrophe. It’s this
bilateral play where Ice forms its strongest relationship to The
Trial or The Castle.
In
the end, Ice is clearly a novel that has crossed the line
between novel as entertainment and novel as art. Christopher Priest
has called the novel ‘plotless’, and I concur. A series of
fevered dreams with minimal transition, tension is maintained
throughout with desire and inaccessibility, as well as the
encroaching narrative device of ice.
No comments:
Post a Comment