John
Steinbeck was one of the great observers of humanity. Writing non-fiction based on his experiences
in various parts of the US
and the world, the overwhelming majority of his novels likewise present people
and situations in a wholly realistic manner.
Forever with an eye to the common man, much of his Depression era
fiction examines the civil strife sweeping the land; seemingly everything was
scarce for the majority of the population.
But with harvest time came an opportunity, albeit temporary, for migrant
workers to collect the bounty of the season, that is, if farmers and owners
were willing to pay fair wages for the work.
In almost every way a precursor to The
Grapes of Wrath, Steinbeck’s 1936 novel In
Dubious Battle examines the human side of labor strikes in the 1930s in both
leftist and realist tones.
In Dubious Battle (title taken from Paradise Lost) is the story of Jim
Nolan, a young man with no direction in life, and Mac, an experienced communist
agitator. Knowing the owners have banded
together to lower wages, at the outset of the novel the pair arrive in a valley
filled with apple orchards ripe for the picking and workers upset at having
their pay reduced. Slowly but
confidently organizing the men and their families into a strike, events soon begin
bouncing back and forth between the owners and workers as anger, scabs, and
local political interests take over.
Escalating into a clash of violent proportions, the lives of Jim and Mac
end up changed forever.
The Grapes of Wrath indirectly presents the
state of labor and economics in the 1930s via the very personal story of the
Joads. In Dubious Battle has the same aim, but presents the theme in
direct, situational terms. This is not
to say Steinbeck refrains from involving the reader in the lives of Jim, Mac,
and the others, rather the curtains are pulled further back to reveal the stage
and larger cast of characters upon which labor strikes of the 1930s
happened. The coordination of and
reaction to a strike highly complex, Steinbeck brings all of his real life
experiences living and talking with migrant fruit workers in California in the
1930s, to bear upon the narrative, rendering a story that is both affective and
authentic feeling.
In Dubious Battle often possesses more
the feel of a work of journalism than literary fiction. The men’s feelings, the posturing, the
threats tossed back and forth, and the violence that erupts are all powerfully
real but laid out in plain, direct terms.
The text is thus not the best of Steinbeck’s writing from a prose
perspective. The looming strike a great
tension builder, Steinbeck does, however, wholly capitalize on the stages of
the social phenomenon, both subtle and overt, for literary effect. Mac’s talk may at times be more archetypal
than mimetic, the situations he comments upon nevertheless come straight from
the pages of history.
In Dubious Battle thus makes an
interesting counter-point to many of the dystopian novels produced around the
time the book was published warning of the dangers of socialism/communism. Like The
Grapes of Wrath, Steinbeck presents matters from the common man’s
perspective, allowing theory to fall where it will. Rather than bandy about ideas, the facts of
people’s lives are laid bare on the page for the reader to see and contextualize. In short, the novel is heavily politicized
from a quotidian man point of view, and given the realism of the presentation,
makes matters difficult for proponents of capitalism to dispute, theory the
only option.
In the
end, In Dubious Battle is a polarized
view of the labor situation in America
during the Depression. Damning
capitalism, Steinbeck presents his leftist views via the situation. What makes this approach difficult to fault
is the realism underpinning events as they pan out. Not painting the strikers as angels void of
fault, their narrow view motivates the story as much as the greed of the
orchard owners. The novel thus possesses
strong impact despite being propaganda and is worth reading for anyone
interested in the lesser known of Steinbeck’s works, socialist fiction, or just
a human tale of labor strikes in the 1930s.
Steinbeck and his writing are not "leftist". They are human.
ReplyDeletePlease at least have the decency to quote the whole line...
Delete"...In Dubious Battle examines the human side of labor strikes in the 1930s in both leftist and realist tones."
I believe we are on the same page.