Coming
across reviews of Dan Simmons’ 2011 Flashback
prior to reading the novel, I was struck by the number of times I came
across the sentiment “good book, except
for Simmons’ heavy right-wing views.”
A lot of genre readers these days overly sensitive to the idea of what
constitutes an extreme conservative view, the repeated commentary added
intrigue to what the back cover synopsis promised to be a burning
thriller. (After all, don’t weapons
floating freely in society go hand in hand with action plots? How can it be so strange?) Having now finished the novel, I’m able to
comment myself. Is Simmons’ view an
extreme right wing one? Depends on
perspective…
Nick
Bottom lives in a flashback haze. The
drug allowing him to recollect complete memories of times with his now-dead wife,
he scrapes by on random private eye money, living in a cubbyhole in what was
once a Denver shopping mall. European
and North American political weaknesses having allowed the Middle East to take
power in the aftermath of nuclear war, most of the western world is now
controlled by a Grand Caliphate. Japan
reverting to feudal ways, the land of the rising sun controls the majority of
what is not in the Caliphate’s hands.
And it’s the leader of one of their largest, most influential
corporations that calls Bottom to his office one day. His son’s murder still unsolved, he hopes
that Bottom, who was part of the original investigation, will be able to use
flashback to relive the investigation and turn up clues that may have been
missed. With promise of all the drug he
wants, Bottom readily accepts. It’s
going back through crime scene, however, that he gets a big surprise: peeking
over the hood of a car is his wife.
Further revelations coming quickly thereafter, Bottom is dragged
in.
Simmons
taking what he learned from the three Joe Kurtz contemporary crime novels he
has published to date and adding a near-future backdrop, Flashback expands the criminal element from mafia to global and
corporate conspiracy. Bottom inhales his
demons, but the overall effect on his life is the same self-destructive PI
detached from society. This includes not
only Bottom’s present-state existence, but also his family. Having shipped his son off to live with the
grandfather while he perpetually turns memory’s dial back to the moments he
most cherishes, Bottom makes for both classic Chandler-esque and contemporary
anti-hero.
A
tool rather than an idea to be explored, however, flashback is not used in as
complex a manner as it could have been.
To put it another way, Simmons does not channel Proust. Flashback
is a straight-ahead action thriller. The
pace of the novel is kept fast, the reveal of key plot elements appropriate to
mode (i.e. Simmons does a good job keeping the reader guessing all the way to
the end), and there are relevant scenes of sensationalism, from satellite
weaponry to street riots, desert commando shootouts to terrorist attacks. Simmons even finds time to pay tribute to Mad Max and A Clockwork Orange.
The
Obama administration and Canadian and European governments laid to blame for
acting as doormats for Middle Eastern and Japanese empire building, it’s easy
to see how readers might think Flashback
is a vehicle for right-wing propaganda.
But it remains ambiguous.
Certainly, Simmons’ political views could be on full display: there is
more than enough evidence to support the claim, from truck driver tirades to
the impetus for the setting. Then again,
it may just be the author’s right to use ideas from the real world to build
their imaginary backdrop—to take advantage of existing media currents to
present a paranoid scenario of how things might turn out. After all, such extensions of reality are
some of the things readers look to writers for.
Just because the setting is right wing doesn’t by default equate to
Simmons’ political views being in parallel.
In fact, guns are ubiquitous in the novel, but they do not make the
novel’s world a safer place. Bottom’s
son mischievous in a way possible only in Flashback’s
setting, the novel’s youth seem particularly negatively affected by the
politics of the setup. And if the
novel’s conclusion is taken as sentiment, then the ideas being fought against
certainly do not orient towards draconian politics. All in all, it’s enough to make one question
whether Simmons truly intended his novel as a political statement, or just a
means to an exciting plot-end…
In
the end, Flashback is a novel with
ties to numerous other novels given its post-state/catastrophe setting—flashes
(no pun intended) of McCarthy’s The Road,
David Hutchinson’s Europe in Autumn,
Richard Morgan’s Market Forces, Ken
Macleod’s The Execution Channel visible. But Flashback
distinguishes itself for the manner in which it realizes an extreme right-wing
view of the world. Whether the reader
interprets the politics as Simmons’ own is their choice, as what is presented
is a scary vision of a US where drugs and guns run rampant, and normal, quiet
life is anything but certain. Plot quite
standard for a political thriller/mystery, Simmons’ loosely ties story to
theme, and seems more intent on writing a traditional narrative rather than
examining any ideas associated with the mnemonic recall of memory and the
effect it might have on people.
I was struck as well by the sheer hostility directed toward Simmons after Flashback came out. I couldn't believe how readers equated the narrative voice and the extrapolation of current trends toward a dystopian future with Dan Simmons' personal opinion and political views. Especially, when held up against the twenty-five books he had published until then.
ReplyDeleteI have to say, however, ever since The Terror, I think Simmons' novels have been too long for the own good. Not every novel deserves the 800-page treatment; sometimes the plot and arc of supsense only hold up for two to three hundred pages ... and that's okay (I'm thinking of Drood and The Abominable, in particular, but also Flashback). And at times, it seems he just had to put all his research in, even if it does not help the story-telling (again, The Abominable).
Great review, especially putting a special emphasis on differentiating between the fictional world and the athour's personal views.
Klaas