I had other plans this evening, but after reading Liquidpedia’s
2017 Starcraft 2 awards, I was called to action.
Generally speaking, Liquidpedia got the year right. In the past I have found myself sometimes blinking
in surprise reading a mizenhauer write up, but given he was consolidating award
input from Liquidpedia staff, the results are more balanced. But not without some oversights I believe,
hence the call to action.
The first award was to Special
as ‘Breakout Player’. My first instinct was that it didn’t feel
right, but slowly came around to agree. First,
Special didn’t win anything. His best showing was a top-4 at Blizzcon, which,
to be fair, is a major accomplishment and indeed the best showing of his career. Otherwise, he failed to get out of all the GSL
round of 32s he qualified for and did not win any other Premier tournaments—Dreamhacks,
IEMs, etc. At the same time, none of the
other options feels right either, for example Elazer, Gumiho, Stats, and Rogue. An argument could be made for each in comparison
to their past performances. But in the
end, I think the greatest distance covered was indeed by Special. A new id
for a new mindset, we now call him Special instead of Major. And for sure
he put in a huge effort this year, so good to recognize him.
'Strategy of the Year’, meh, whatever. Better to give one per race, not one overall (if at all), but what do I know? ‘Biggest News Event of the Year’ was awarded to Starcraft 2 being free to play. Sure, why not? It’s as good a pick as any—and beats “KESPA offices raided by police on suspicion of corruption”…
'Strategy of the Year’, meh, whatever. Better to give one per race, not one overall (if at all), but what do I know? ‘Biggest News Event of the Year’ was awarded to Starcraft 2 being free to play. Sure, why not? It’s as good a pick as any—and beats “KESPA offices raided by police on suspicion of corruption”…
‘Most Entertaining
Player’ went to Alive. Without PartinG playing SC2
anymore, I think Alive is a good
choice, not to mention good to recognize him for a solid year—at least the first
half when he seemed the only one who could beat Innovation. His
matches at the first GSL Super Tournament were insane (and perhaps only nerves
prevented him from taking down herO in the
final?). The other contender for this award
would have to be Soo. Getting into three premier finals, all with
the question ‘Will this be the one?’
hanging over them, is nail-biting stuff.
Hanging in the shadows as minor contenders are SoS and Rogue. A place at Blizzcon anything but certain,
watching the two fight for the final spot toward the end of the year was also nail-biting,
entertaining stuff. Dark was Liquidpedia’s pick for runner-up for this award, and
while I understand the reason (he never seems to lose big), the consistency of
his dynamism is, well, too consistent, ironically.
‘Best Terran: WCS
Circuit’ went to Special,
and I don’t think anyone can disagree. Kelazhur had a good
year, but Special just always beat
him. Uthermal simply didn’t live up to the hype he built in 2016. A year ago I thought MaSa might improve in 2017, but he proved to be a
non-entity. ‘Best Terran: Korea’ went to Innovation,
and I don’t think I can disagree (more later).
TY also had a
very strong year winning more than $200k, but simply not as good as Innovation’s.
‘Best Zerg: WCS
Circuit’ went to Elazer. The voting was unanimous, so no runner-up was
listed, which is a shame as I thought Snute and Serral actually had pretty good years (Snute reached two WCS finals, one more than Elazer, in fact.).
But indeed, Elazer was the
best, beating Snute at one of
the premiere WCS event finals, not to mention his total points were higher,
meaning he was the more consistent player. ‘Best
Zerg: Korea’ went to Rogue, with
no runner-up. This is the award I
disagree with the most as it ignores what Soo
accomplished in 2017: two GSL finals and a Blizzon final. Rogue was scary only
at the tail end of the season, while Soo was relevant
at both ends. Rogue came within sniffing distance of a GSL final (and was taken
out by Soo—one of Soo’s lings, in fact), and was non-existent in Starleague. Rogue did win two
premiere tournaments, which is obviously the reason why he was named the best
of the year. But not to have Soo as runner-up is to overlook the great year he had.
‘Best Protoss: WCS
Circuit’ went to Neeb, and
there is nobody’s grandmother who could disagree with that. There isn’t even a close second place. ‘Best
Protoss: Korea’ is also not very close.
Winning GSL and Starleague trophies, not to mention being consistent
enough to dominate the season’s point standings, Stats was far and above the best in a year when Protoss (not named
Neeb or Stats)
sometimes seemed to struggle.
‘Series of the Year’
and ‘Game of the Year’ are things that
I wish I kept better notes on, so I could agree or disagree. Overall, Legacy
of the Void is the best iteration of Starcraft 2, and there were a shit-ton
of games that proved why. From TY and Maru’s seven-game
epic WESG final at the beginning of the year to SoS and Innovation’s thrilling seven-game
set to close the third and final GSL season of the year, I saw so many good
series and matches that I don’t know I could choose just one… (See below for a brief overview of some of
the great series this year…)
‘Player of the Year:
WCS Circuit’ was Neeb, and
again, it’s impossible to disagree.
There was only one premiere WCS event he didn’t win. In Korea, things
were a little more interesting. ‘Player of the Year: Korea’ was awarded
to Innovation, and
as much as I avoid the Innovation hype train, with
four titles, it’s true: he had the best year of any Korean player. (And I do think there are strong arguments for
him being GOAT.) But I think a case could be made for Stats as runner-up for Korean player of the year. The reason is, Stats was the most consistent player, getting higher in the
tournaments he played in even if he didn’t win, and as a result leading the
points standing at the end of the year.
And there’s something to be said for consistency. For sure Innovation deserves the
award, but Stats should likewise
be recognized for a year almost as good.
(Liquipedia writers do not, apparently, feel the same about consistency
as their choice for runner-up was Rogue, a
player who peaked at the tail end of the year and had just enough points to get
into the big daddy—Blizzcon, which he did go on to win. It will be very interesting to see whether Rogue will be the same monster in 2018.)
What I’m curious is, why didn’t Liquidpedia include categories
for ‘Best Major Tournament of the Year’, ‘Best Minor Tournament of the Year’, ‘Best
non-Professional Tournament of the Year’, ‘Team of the Year’, or ‘Sponsor of
the Year’? The Tournament categories are
a way of recognizing great games that occurred online as well as the many
people and channels which support SC2, just not in a primetime way. (Rifkin makes terrible jokes, but he’s great
at organizing tournaments, just as HomeStory Cup is perhaps the most amazing
tournament to watch in terms of getting to know the players and atmosphere.) In signing Stats, Solar,
and TY, Splyce should
be recognized for their support of SC2, and JinAir Greenwings should be recognized
for not only sponsoring a team but the whole year’s worth of Starleague
tournament action. (Good on them!!) Starcraft 2 will not be around forever (we
may be in its swan song now), so any chance to recognize those who keep it
afloat should be taken.
Now, going into 2018, what to expect? Maybe that is a call to action to write more…
As mentioned, here is a further list of great matches from
2017:
GSL Season 1: Stats vs. Innovation, Soo vs. TY
IEM World Championship Katowice: Alive vs. Innovation, TY vs. Stats.
WCS Jonxoping: Neeb vs. Serral
WCS Valencia: Snute vs. Elazer, Special vs. Neeb
GSL vs. the World: Neeb vs. TY, Stats vs. Special
GSL Season 3: SoS vs. Innovation, Innovation vs. Dark, Solar vs. SoS
Starleague Season 2: Dark vs. Stats
WCS Montreal: Showtime vs. Kelazhur
GSL Super Tournament #2: Rogue vs. Innovation
Blizzcon: Soo vs. Gumiho, TY vs. Innovation, Rogue vs. TY
No comments:
Post a Comment