Since reading Cloud Atlas a few years ago, I have been on the David Mitchell bandwagon. But there has always been a nagging sense of
incompleteness, of rough edges in the novels I’ve read since. For as singular the storyline of The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet is,
it has a little trouble blending its viewpoints and thus building a holistic
plot. Cloud Atlas is an superb mish-mash of fiction, but has some trouble
distinguishing its character voices. Ghostwritten is an excellent debut, but has
issues balancing exuberant prose against focused theme. With 2014’s The Bone Clocks, however, everything has finally come together, the
edges smoothed, and a polished gem the result.
An extremely satisfying read that would seem to fulfill all of
Mitchell’s potential, it might just be a masterpiece.
Structured like a pinwheel, the story of teenage-runaway Holly
Sykes forms the center pin of The Bone
Clocks, while the stories of an unprincipled Cambridge student who
eventually faces the most difficult choice of his life, a curmudgeonly British
writer who must face declining sales, a war
reporter who has trouble balancing his family life with being in the action, and
a reincarnated therapist who must use her centuries of wisdom to combat an evil
foe—all form the blades spiraling away from the center of the pinwheel. Sykes’ story (in old age) forms the final
section of the novel, forming a cycle by spinning full circle the events and
characters,. Mitchell using this structure to great effect in terms of both
plot and theme, The Bone Clocks is
innately a questioning of contemporary culture while telling the highly
engaging story of one woman’s anything-but-normal life.
One of, if not the main draws to Mitchell, is his chewy,
gravy-soaked prose. And The Bone Clocks brings a similar meal to
the table. Perpetually dynamic, sentence
after sentence, I didn’t want the novel to end, despite its 650+ pages. It flows in enlivening fashion, rendering
what could be mundane affairs in a vibrant, often clever light. (Many turns of phrase are brilliant.) A criticism I had of Cloud Atlas is that Mitchell didn’t tailor his exuberant voice to
suit character/scene. In The Bone Clocks, this is recitified. One of the characters, Crispin Hershey (“the wild child of British letters”), is
perhaps the perfect outlet for Mitchell’s exuberance for language, while Ed
Brubeck, the war reporter, has a suitably toned down voice yet one that remains
involving, proving Mitchell has dug deeper to find another gear, a gear that is
his own by style, but one more refined by flavor. Pure and simple, the writing crackles.
While the title is a metaphor for mortality (i.e. that our
coils are winding down), the focus of the novel is actually: what are we/you
doing with your mortality that allows for the existence of future generations
of humanity? Way beyond procreation, it’s
about human behavior as a whole today and how it is affecting the Earth and
society, tomorrow. One of the main
sub-plots of the novel pits a group of immortals (who sustain immortality by eating
the souls of living) against a group of reincarnates—people who occupy mortal
human bodies but are reincarnated in other bodies upon death. While it would be easy to read a Buddhist
message in such a setup, it’s more advisable, given the other elements of the
novel, to view the dichotomy as a metaphor for current business, economic, and
political practice (i.e. super greed) in the West, as it compares with a more
sustainable practices, behaviors, and worldviews that look beyond spending
today what you won’t have tomorrow. What
are we leaving/doing to ensure future generations have good lives? The immortal/reincarnate war forming only a
sub-plot, that the main plot focuses on Holly Sykes’ life indicates the true
core of Mitchell’s agenda.
In the end, The Bone
Clocks features all of the elements which have come to distinguish a Mitchell
novel—the staggered timeline, the variety of character viewpoints, the atypical
structure, aand the superb, lively prose.
But The Bone Clocks brings all
of these pieces together into a entity that I daresay Mitchell has not yet
achieved in his ouevre. Addressing the primary cause of the world’s current
ills (rampant greed) in unassailable style that creates vivid, real characters,
portrays the palpable passage of time through real world events (and some not
yet real but portrayed just as), and rooted in the desire for something better
from humanity, this is a novel worth all of the recognition and accolades it
has received, and of course, reading.
I’m thisclose to declaring it a masterpiece, but something tells me
Mitchell can still write something even better.
I’m happily waiting…
No comments:
Post a Comment