*July 8, 2013 - Dissatisfied with the original review, below is a re-posting with significant revisions.
The scene set and characters introduced
in Pashazade and the broader picture of
El Ishkandryia painted in Effendi, Felaheen (2003) is the closing chapter
in the Arabesk trilogy. Ashraf’s history the open issue, Jon
Courtenay Grimwood puts his main character through the toughest ringer yet in
discovering the answer—if it can be answered at all, history being the greased
pig that it is. As hinted at by the
title (for those who have been paying attention in the series thus far), things
will not turn out as the reader expects.
Style-wise, the novel is the best written of the three, making for a
smart conclusion to a smart trilogy.
(Perhaps it goes without saying: do not attempt Felaheen—or this review—if you have not read the first two books.)
Remaining part alternate history, part
mainstream fiction, part cyberpunk, and all detective noir, 2003 Felaheen
is a conclusion fully consistent with Pashazade
and Effendi. Grimwood pulling no tricks on the reader, the
setting, style, and characters are as reliable as ever. What remains unreliable, however, is the
plot. Ashraf going to meet his alleged
father, the Emir of Tunis, at the outset of the novel, his arrival portends an
assassination attempt on Emir. Unsure
who would care to kill the crazed elderly man, Ashraf must investigate to clear
his own name, and in the process protect himself from the Emir’s other son, one
Kashif Pasha, who may or may not be vying to usurp Raf’s inheritance of Tunisia. Forced underground, the secrets Raf uncovers
may lead him to his heritage, and then again, it may lead to his death.
Filling out roughly half of Felaheen are flashbacks to the younger
days of Raf’s mother, Sally Welham.
Bohemian ways making her a world traveler with a lot of frivolity, it is
fleshing out her travels, through Thailand,
Tunisia, and New York, that the
details of Raf’s parentage begin to filter into place. As with the previous books, Hani and Zara
continue to play important roles, their interrelationship with Raf
concluded—but not how readers may expect.
The first two
books in the Arabesk series nominated, Felaheen finally won
Grimwood the BSFA award in 2003. And
it’s easy to see why. His prose is crisp and polished, and the themes at
work, including the value of identity, relativism of history, and the
environment, not to mention the religious and cultural concerns of Islam and North Africa as they confront a globalizing world, are
all issues poignant to not only literary minded science fiction, but society at
large. Like all good writers, Grimwood’s voice never proselytizes and is
able to relate these concerns in a fashion that suits the story yet rises above
to strike the reader as important beyond the covers. Readers can argue
which of the three novels of Arabesk
is best, but given the consistency it’s good to see Grimwood finally rewarded
for the effort.
The issue the same throughout the
series, I have saved my sticking point until the closing novel. The only point where the books fall short is
creative expectation. Having borrowed the alternate history idea at work
in Dick’s Man
in the High Castle, the biotech of Gibson’s Sprawl
trilogy, the noir moods of Chandler’s The Long Goodbye, and the
mainstream plotting of most New York Times bestsellers, Grimwood adds little
new to the genre except a solid, well conceived effort. And while it
certainly requires skill to combine these different elements into a single
story, such books remain derivative rather than pace-setting. It fills
the gaps rather than creating them. This is not to say that every author
should aim to push the limits of sci-fi, but by merely riding the laurels of
others, it’s difficult to say with certainty that the author has earned a place
among the greats. There is a place for Grimwood’s sci-fi, and he
occupies it in style. Suffice to say, Arabesk
is recommended as quality reading, just not as cutting edge.
No comments:
Post a Comment