There are few works in literature, let
alone science fiction, that can match the power of the statement Aldous Huxley
makes about humanity and its future in his landmark Brave New World. Required
reading in schools across the US, Huxley plausibly creates a bright, wonderful
future society, then destroys it in one massive proverbial blow. Published in 1932, the book’s reaction to
American economic and cultural practice has been largely justified by the
ongoing homogenization of world culture, making it one of the most relevant
works created to date on the subject of globalization, cultural evolution, and the future of
technology’s role in society.
Brave
New World,
particularly the outset, is largely an exercise in world building. Wholly a futuristic vision, society is
organized along much different, though credible lines. Childbirth now possible only for a chosen
few, babies are grown in vats and intelligence decanted to Alpha, Beta, Cappa,
Delta and Epsilon levels. Epsilons
performing the manual labor and Alphas the brain work, society is striated to
the maximum. Everyone, however, is able
to enjoy sensuality (recreational sex and “feely” movies), socio-religious
experiences, drug induced happiness (soma),
and materialist consumption in keeping with the Word State’s Commerce
Economy. A utopia, Huxley's plot sets about
dismantling the vision one ideological brick at a time.
Brave
New World
opens with Lenina Crowe, an Alpha working with vaccinations in the Hatchery,
and Bernard Marx, a colleague whose work focuses on sleep-learning. Bernard likewise an Alpha, complications
during birth have left him stunted as an adult, an inferiority complex when
dealing with other Alphas developing in tow.
Lenina and Bernard’s relationship largely one to introduce readers to
the society Huxley envisions, things pick up when Bernard, with the thought of
getting romantic with Lenina, invites her to the “wilds” - a reservation in the
American hinterland where people are not subject to the World State and live as
savages. It is when meeting one of the men
there, dubbed John the Savage, that the story takes off, the clash of
perspective powering the novel through to its dramatic conclusion.
Setting a good example for science
fiction writers of today, Huxley’s attention to detail is irreproachable. Brave
New World presents a fully fleshed futuristic setting, from societal norms
to technological advances, neologisms to theological concerns. Citizens are exclaiming “Oh Ford!” instead of
“Oh Lord!” in honor of the production line’s founder. At the learning centers, youth are engaged in
sexual play from an early age, disease and conception not a fear. Anytime depression or negative thoughts occur,
drugs are readily available to put a spring back in your step, ready to face
the other happy consumers around you.
And caste disputes are non-existent.
With food and homes available at the same quality by status and social
conditioning in place since birth, competition and infighting to scramble
through the ranks is unheard of, society at peace.
From an ideological point of view,
Huxley accomplishes everything he sets out to accomplish in Brave New World with triumph. Starting with creating a scenario and presenting how
characters behave within it, the last paragraph of the novel is a powerful
knockout blow to the mechanization of human behavior and frivolity of personal
worth. John the Savage the crux upon
which the story hinges, experiencing the future through his eyes is both
fascinating and terrifying.
I'm glad to see you add Brave New World to your reviews. It's one of the books that left a permanent impression on me when I read it in my mid-teens, along with Dante's Inferno, More's Utopia, and Thoreau's Walden (more decades ago than I care to admit). The thing about it that had the biggest impact on me, back then, was the fact that Huxley wasn't warning of a future world imposed on us from above by a tyranny, but rather one all of us will be responsible for, and all of us will happily welcome.
ReplyDeleteI also read Brave New World as a teen, and indeed, it leaves a powerful impression, one which I too feel today. You raise an interesting point with the "happily welcome" comment. We could debate the nihilism of it :), but there is no denying many of Huxley's ideas have only become more rather than less relevant in the years since.
DeleteThanks for visiting my tiny corner of the blogosphere!
I agree that Brave New World has become more relevant, not less. And much more relevant than 1984. Here's part of an interview where Huxley discusses (as I believe he did in Brave New World Revisited, if I remember correctly) how totalitarianism in the future will be "with the consent of the ruled" (happily welcomed): http://youtu.be/iUTEOY1hre4
ReplyDeleteSuperb interview! It really highlights Huxley's insight into ideas regarding the slow, imperceptible evolution of society into a form it would not accept were it to be presented in black and white terms at the outset.
Delete"The price of freedom is eternal diligence." - a great quote!
Thanks!
Huxley is turning in his grave nearly 100 years after his visionary prophecies began to form into his own mode of fiction. He is one of my favorite authors and raised serious issues and made world-wide breakthroughs in the research of psychedelics as well as our cognitive liberties. I drew a portrait as homage to the man and his works. See the him roll with the mushrooms, the pills and the doors of perception at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2010/07/aldous-huxley-rolls-in-his-grave.html
ReplyDeleteWhile Huxley certainly deserves mention for the willingness to test his aristocratic acceptance by openly delving into psychedelics, I'm not sure the idea encompasses his oeuvre. In fact, when looking at his life as a whole, psychedelics entered very late. The majority of his books, fiction and non-fiction, were published prior, including Brave New World. It was only with the counter-culture's birth toward the end of Huxley's life that the mysticism, philosophy, and open-mindedness of his approach to psychedelics were brought to a wider audience. For the majority of his career, he was well-known amongst a different circle, and for a different caliber of idea. So while the counter-culture may have set Huxley up as a scion (given he indirectly advocated their behavior), I'm not sure psychedelics fully represent Huxley as a person or writer--integral, yes, but representative, no.
DeleteI wonder if Huxley came to the conclusion that the only way to counter a totalitarian state that freely distributes mind-numbing drugs (a possibility he seems to have genuinely feared) was with an underground distribution of (supposedly) awareness-enhancing drugs. I don't know. But if he did, then there's irony in this site I ran across ... http://www.huxley.net/ ... where a proponent of transhumanism (enhancment of the mind and body through drugs, genetic engineering, and other technologies) calls Brave New World "insidious."
ReplyDeleteCertainly there would seem to be the need for a refining of terms...
Delete