With
the quality of special effects improved exponentially, the blockbuster disaster
movie appeared in the 90s and hasn’t looked back. Tornadoes (Twister), meteors (Deep
Impact and Armageddon), seismic
activity (The Core), volcanoes (Dante’s Peak), massive weather events (The Perfect Storm), and, who can forget,
Sharknado, have in one way or another
tried to capitalize on the potential power of nature to earn a dollar. Opening with a reasonably plausible
scientific premise (except in the case of the latter, of course), then quickly
cutting to the melodrama and special effects, these films have done nothing to
make people aware of the physical laws governing the actualities of our world
and the true potential for catastrophe.
In writing the Science in the
Capitol trilogy, Kim Stanley Robinson aimed to correct that imbalance. The
most realistic look at the intersection of environmentalism and politics the
genre has yet produced, Forty Signs of
Rain, the first book in the trilogy, is an important book that, while
perhaps not possessing the flare many people stereotype sci-fi as having,
nevertheless frames the American political situation in a fashion extremely
relevant to the modern world and the toll humans are slowly taking on it.
Forty Signs of Rain centers on the
lives of two men: Frank Vanderwal, a microbiologist, and Charlie Quibler, house
husband and environmental policy advisor, both living in Washington DC. At the outset of the story, Frank is winding
down his year at the National Science Foundation and preparing himself to
return to the research organization where he is employed in San Diego. A group of Buddhist delegates from the
country Khembalung, a ficitonal waterlogged island off the coast of Kolkota,
have recently rented office space in the first floor of their building, and
through his colleague Anna Quibler (Charlie’s wife), are introduced. Khembalung drowning as the waters of the
ocean rise higher and higher each year, the delegates have come to Washington
to plead their case and get assistance for their people, both financially and
in political terms that will see a change in global environmental
practices. Charlie, though spending most
of his time caring for his two year old son Joe, is able to squeeze in
negotiations and bill writing for the most environmentally supportive
politician, Senator Phil Chase. Charlie
frustrated with the cuts and elisions to the bills he proposes, and Frank
frustrated with the NSF’s inability to enact real change, by the end of the
novel both get what they want, but have something else, something major in
common to complain about.
Point
blank, Forty Signs of Rain is the
most politically and environmentally overt novel I’ve read by Robinson. Making no bones about his stance, quotes such
as the following underlie the ideology of both Charlie and Frank:
“If the Earth
were to suffer a catastrophic anthropogenic extinction event over the next ten
years, which it will, American business would continue to focus on its
quarterly profit and loss. There is no
economic mechanism for dealing with catastrophe. And yet government and the scientific
community are not tackling this situation, either, indeed both have consented
to be run by neoclassical economics, an obvious pseudo-science. We might as well be governed by astrologers.”
(190)
The
novel is thus contentious for those who feel global warming is a myth and that
the current system is well equipped to handle environmental disaster were it
ever to strike big.
Regardless
the reader’s political stance, Forty Signs of Rain
is a novel obviously meant to challenge. Packed to the gills with realistic
scenarios involving political negotiation and environmentalism in government,
sympathizers will overlook the contrived dialogue, Arthur C. Clarke do-no-wrong
scientists, occasional cheesy plot development, and will focus on the integrity
of the content. Robinson only partially
integrating plot and information, mainstream devices alternate with info dumps
on behavior theory, climate change, economic models, and, interestingly enough,
paradigm shifts, in telling the story.
In
the end, Forty Signs of Rain is an
anti-capitalist book that does more than point out faults in the system. Melodrama (largely) pushed to the background,
the novel is an anti-disaster story for its foregrounding of the realism of the
build up to a disaster scenario, particularly the group negligence which may be
the agent. Backed by science, and to
some extent Buddhism, Robinson lays the groundwork for a situation that would
better meet the long term goals of humanity.
Robinson appears to have a great handle on how science and politics are
integrated, and how they might be better integrated—a Kuhnian Glass Bead Game as it were. Bacigalupi got angry in The Windup Girl and started shooting greedy corporate
executives. In Forty Signs of Rain, Robinson simply lays bare the reality of the
system which supports such executives, then envisions the result. Undoubtedly
the next two books in the trilogy, Fifty
Degrees and Rising and Sixty Days and
Counting will expand the ideas.
Definitely his most politically outspoken novel. Frank in particular can be quite radical. I've always wondered if Robinson would have written the flood scenes differently if he'd written it after hurricane Katrina. With those scenes in mind the events in Washington seem rather... tame.
ReplyDeleteI read your recent review of the novel and was wondering whether it was worth posting mine as we seem to have a very similar perspective.
DeleteHadn't thought of the New Orleans parallel, but now that you mention it, Robinson's vision is rather tame in comparison. Not so often mother nature outstrips science fiction... :) If you get the chance, check out a film called Samsara. Not a film in the conventional sense, a couple of filmmakers took HD cameras to various places in the world and set them up for a few days, editing the footage into a coherent collage later in the studio. No dialogue or action, it is simply visuals from strange, interesting, and beautiful places around the world, including post-flood New Orleans.
A similar perspective perhaps the approaches to the review is quite different.
DeleteI'll have a look around for that film, sounds interesting.