It seems that for every ‘good’ piece of technology, a ‘bad’ exists to
offset it. And for every invention
developed with the best of intentions, it sure seems able to be put to some
awful uses. Medicine, atomic bombs,
television—you name it, it fits within the multi-colored spectrum of humanity’s
creations—a spectrum that seems to sum at zero in the end. Seemingly no chance to avoid the development,
use, and misuse of technology, it’s best to take a fatalistic view; whatever
happens, happens—at least this is the view I came upon reading Kurt Vonnegut’s
1963 Cat’s Cradle.
Cat’s Cradle is the story of the everyday journalist John and his attempts to write a
book about what Americans were doing the day Hiroshima was bombed. Desiring to include the inventor himself,
John seeks out Felix
Hoenikker, the brain power behind the weapon.
Learning he’s since passed, however, John settles for interviewing his
surviving children. Through the course
of getting the interviews and other material for the book, John arrives on the
island of San Lorenzo in the Caribbean.
The local dictator not the only strange aspect to life there, a religion
called Bokononism permeates society with mysterious precepts shrouded in words
such as ‘karass’, ‘foma’, ‘sinookas’, and many others. John also learns of a secret substance called
ice-nine and its radical potential to alter the world in ways humanity never
dreamed. But the biggest surprise of all
on San Lorenzo is the dictator’s announcement on his deathbed. John’s job is about to change.
If it isn’t obvious, one of the currents flowing through Cat’s Cradle regards the moral
responsibility of the application of scientific knowledge. The atom bomb something difficult to justify
the creation of from an ethical point of view, Vonnegut points a satirical
finger at Hoenniker—mapped out by the title of the novel. Ice-nine taking the theme to the next level,
however, Vonnegut moves from pointing to stabbing, the resulting humor never
blacker. Or bleaker.
There are many, including Vonnegut himself, who state that Slaughterhouse-Five is an anti-war
piece. The proof fully evident, it’s
difficult to dispute. But there are
additional facets to the novel that get little print. Taking what was encapsulated in the
ubiquitous “And so it goes” into deeper waters, Cat’s Cradle is a more profound expression of fatalism, i.e. the
logical step falling after anti- anything.
The climax of Cat’s Cradle
occurring perhaps closer to the middle than the end, the denouement goes much
further than Slaughterhouse-Five
toward indicating that, combating the type of stupidity which has no respect
for the potential human use of technology, i.e. ice nine, is futile. Vonnegut appears to have reconciled himself
to the fact that the use of science is beyond the control of humanity, and that
with inevitable invention comes inevitable use and misuse, application and
misapplication.
In the end, Cat’s Cradle is a
highly imaginative work of satire.
Vonnegut honing in on science, particularly scientific application, he
first creates a space for discussion on the moral aspects of developing
technology that is known will only cause destruction (e.g. the atomic bomb),
before moving to the criticism of technology whose use at first appears
innocuous, but upon extended examination reveals itself as a game-changer for
humanity whether it wanted it to be or not.
A strong sense of fatalism underlying it all, Vonnegut’s creative juices
were flowing. Bokononism one of the
great, unheralded fictional ‘religions’, and for that, along with the
aforementioned reasons, is one of two novels Vonnegut himself thinks of as his
best (Slaughterhouse-Five the other).
No comments:
Post a Comment