Everybody
knows the story of Alice in Wonderland. A little girl playing in her yard one day
discovers a little hole, falls in, and suddenly arrives in technicolor
fairyland bizarro. Innumerable
similarities posited by science fiction, Lewis Carroll’s nonsensical vision of
a little girl’s adventures in a world far abstract from her own makes for
something of an ur-text for the ‘sensibility’ of post-human fiction. I guess that would make Bruce Sterling’s
superb Holy Fire (1996) a post-human rabbit
hole.
Medical
economist Mia Ziemann is out for a walk through the rolling streets of San
Francisco one shining morning when she is invited to the home of a very old
friend. Martin, like Mia, is chock full
of medical enhancements that have pushed his lifespan well-beyond the
natural. But he has reached his limit:
he knows he will die the following day.
Martin having bequeathed his memory palazzo to her, on the way home Mia
ponders what to do with the lifetime of digital memories. While having a drink at a café, she
encounters a teenager learning how to design her own clothes. Inspired, Mia decides the next day to have a
controversial new treatment that will restore her body to its twenty-year old
form. Awakening from the procedure with
the vim, vigor, and rashness only the young possesses is too late: she’s fallen
down her own rabbit hole.
Young,
rebellious, and beautiful, Mia goes on to have many an adventure. Mostly in Europe, she meets people from all
stations in late 21st century society—the ideological pickpocket, the couture
fashion designer, the centurian photographer, the artifice professor, and
others are all as memorable and sharp-tongued as a Jack Vance character yet
finely tuned to a Bruce Sterling semi-satirical, cuttingly realistic
near-future vision of what humanity may become.
Ideas—big
ideas—lurk beneath Mia’s romp through Sterling’s delightfully imagined newly
post-human Earth. Art, artifice, the
pursuit of immortality, and youth and ageing bounce around the story, the
characters, and their conversations in imaginative, engaging fashion. While the bibliophile Terry Dowling has drawn the conclusion
the novel represents “A realised version
of the old people are boring meme”, I would say reducing the novel to such
is rather simplistic. Mia’s rejuvenated
youth makes her the object of artists and artificers (more later), and as such, Sterling
seems more to be commenting upon the consumer society we live and its pursuit
of aesthetic perfection (i.e. we rarely see the elderly advertizing anything
save the latest pharmaceutical) in contrast to the imperfections of nature and
and grit of reality. Beyond just a ‘young is
best’ approach, Mia’s arc, from geriatric to newly-20-something, transcends the age
barriers. Not in fantasy fashion, rather in a personally meaningful fashion,
the novel’s conclusion is an interesting moment few readers can predict that
bridges the gap between Alice and a new definition of sainthood.
While
immortality and aging are sure to get the spotlight in most reviews, it would
be remiss not to mention Holy Fire’s
perspective on art and artifice, whether or not a line exists between the two,
and the hand-in-hand (hand-in-glove?) relationship with age and immortality the
subjects have. Starting simply, modern
art (in the general sense) has become less natural (also in the general
sense). With machines and computers
having a significant effect on music, graphic media, film, etc., the casual
observer no longer is certain what they see is real (in the general sense) or an
imitation—an artifice. From something as
simple as women’s makeup to something as complex as film special effects,
contemporary Western life is as far from ‘natural’ as it ever has been. Mia’s post-human society taking up the baton
of this discussion, her rejuvenated body represents a paradox of the natural
and unnatural. The art crowd she ends up
running with for a short time in Stuttgart and Prague looking at the issue from
more interesting sides and with more informed opinion than I can conjure for
this review, suffice to say Sterling’s inclusion and usage of artifice to
examine and discuss Mia’s life and environment is stellar—and for this reader a
more interesting discussion than just pure immortality.
While
the pursuit of medical techniques that effectively keep a person alive
indefinitely (save ‘misadventure’) are an obvious indicator of novel’s desire
to examine immortality, it does not do so from only the technological
perspective. Another wonderful layer to Holy Fire is Martin’s memory
palazzo. The subjectivity of memory and
the meaning of legacy cropping up alongside effectively rendered techno-jargon
describing rejuvenation tech, Martin’s memory palazzo plays a key role toward
examining the human side of the particular brand of post-humanism Sterling is
digging into.
In
the end, Holy Fire is one of the most
interesting, imaginative, and subtly humorous—and relevant for it—novels the
cyberpunk/post-human era has produced. Sterling’s roving imagination covering
immortality to art, European culture to aging, memory to near-future
sub-culture, he tells an engaging tale of a girl falling down the rabbit hole
of her own desire into a 20-something version of herself, and the resultant
struggle to regain perspective in a world inundated with the ‘unnatural.’ Sterling also lexically on point from page
one, Holy Fire may very well be his
best work.
Nice review. I'm on my third (or fourth?) reread; HF still hold up well, 20 years on.
ReplyDeleteBookmarked your review for my booklog rewrite. My original review is at
http://www.amazon.com/review/RCH6D9A3RNRQE