I’m pissed off—
again yes, but this time more than
usual.
Vegas, and yet another mass shooting in the USA.
Guns are not solely
to blame; there are social and cultural issues that also played a role.
But dammit, guns are the main reason.
The guy had mental and social problems,
clearly, and the type of free-gun society that exists in the US played right
into his hands, along with the hands of the other crazy people who appear about
every year or two doing exactly the same thing. The availability of guns enabled rather than hindered his insane ideas, and there is no arguing around that.
For the record, I’m pro-hunting though I don’t
hunt.
(Anybody who eats meat or wears leather has no
right to be anti-hunting.)
But I am for extremely
strong regulations that force every person who wants a gun to go through
rigorous testing—physical, psychological, etc.—in order to get a license.
Like the check-in process before getting on an
airplane, I trust that the majority of people who use their guns for hunting
and target shooting wouldn’t mind subjecting themselves to testing knowing
that its ultimate purpose is to weed out the maligned, and would in the end make the US a safer place.
In the legal arena, anything that resembles
automatic weaponry, or its accessories, should be prohibited from the market.
Guns should only be sold through official government shops that match gun registration numbers to registered licenses. There should be limits on the number of guns
licensed people can own (two or three seems reasonable,
unlike this). And gun manufacturers should be
limited in the volumes and types of weapons they are allowed to produce.
Yes, you heard me, no open market on the gun
industry. (Which is more valuable: national GDP or the thousands of people who die each year
due to gun violence?) Stronger regulations would not eliminate gun deaths, but would, if done properly, eventually bring the US into line with the majority of
the Western world in terms of gun-death statistics.
I am American but for the past eight years I
have lived in Europe, a continent which is not immune to shootings but for which
the frequency and death toll of those events when they occur
is exponentially smaller
(save Norway, of course).
Guess what, guns are
heavily, heavily restricted here.
In
Poland where I live the licensing process takes roughly a year, and includes a psychological
evaluation, target practice (like a driver’s license test), background search
and criminal record evaluation, a written exam, as well as interviews with
authorities.
There is no reason why a
similar process could not be implemented in the US. Bad people would still be able to get guns, just like in Poland, but the average crazy guy would not be able to go to his local Walmart and with the flick of a credit card become a mass murderer.
God fucking dammit, almost sixty innocent killed and nearly
600 injured in Vegas, and still the message that GUNS ARE A PROBLEM continues
to be ignored where it matters in the US!
It's crazy to me that people will buy more guns after this event, considering there is nothing about owning a gun that could prevented the situation.
My thoughts go out to the victims of the attack, but most especially the
people in the future who will be victims, as, sure as rain it will happen again
in a year or two unless something massive changes in gun regulations. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me 267 times, shame on the government and its politicians for being too weak to overcome the gun lobby and enact better laws that reduce the shame...