When
teaching English, it’s often very useful to provide meters, for example, adverbs
of frequency from the pole of ‘never’ to the pole of ‘always’. Such meters can also be useful in representing
how ideas are used in stories, specifically quantity. There are some writers who hold to the left side
of the spectrum and invoke as many and as much as possible. Charlie Stross is a veritable barrage of
ideas. They flash before the eyes, few
settling into place before the next appears.
Adam Roberts occupies the right side.
Selecting one or two ideas and thoroughly unpacking them, his novels
take a premise and carefully examine its facets. It is thus good news his 2012 Jack Glass: A Golden Age Story contains three ideas to
unpack. Whether they are something as
fresh and invigorating as Stross would dream of, well…
Jack Glass is three windows into the life of the
man, the legend, the eponymous Jack Glass.
Using bits of Agatha Christie, Raymond Chandler, and pulp era sci-fi,
Roberts presents three stories that together form something resembling a
cohesive whole. Starting small and
working outwards, a larger picture of the murderer, teacher, detective, rebel,
guardian, farmer, etc. comes to light as the pages turn. The first story opens with Jac (as he is
called then) imprisoned in an asteroid with six other hardened criminals. Left to fend for themselves with a minimum of
supplies, Jac’s starting point is even more difficult than the others: he’s
legless. Battling the harshness of
social Darwinism in such a masculine, limited environment, Jac makes his
incredulous escape. The second story is
of the young heir to Clan Argent, named Diana, landing on Earth for the first
time. A lover of murder mysteries, she
is immediately confronted by not only gravity, but a real-life whodunit
involving the servants at the house where she is staying. Roberts unveiling more of the solar system
simultaneously, Diana, and her bodyguards Deno, Bethesene, and Iago, eventually
solve the murder, but not without major surprises along the way. (For those who pay attention to details, the
mystery was already solved in Roberts’ novel Gradisil.) And the third and final section of the book is a classic
locked room mystery. An unexplainable
murder taking place inside Jack’s house (or space bubble, as it were), how the
shot came from in not outside is the question on everybody’s mind as matters in
the solar system escalate to FTL proportions.
Jack Glass is an acknowledged homage to science
fiction and murder mysteries of yesteryear.
Roberts even trying his hand at writing in a similar style of prose, the
English village murder in space comes across intentionally quaint.
“’Come out, back
to the house, Miss,’ said Jong-il. Berthezene was pointing his gun into each
room in turn, standing beside each opening with his weapon vertical near his
chest, and leaping out to level it at
possible assailants, over and again. The gun’s barrel: vertical – horizontal.
Vertical – horizontal. ‘The servants are all outside,’ Dia called, peering at
the corpse. ‘There’s nobody in here! You worry-warts!’
‘Death is never a
safe environment, Miss,’ said Iago.
‘Please be
careful, Miss!’ cried Jong-il. ‘The police have been notified!’”
The prison
escape unravels in more exciting, contemporary fashion, and is the strongest
section of the book. And the locked
room, while resolving itself in quasi-deus
ex machina fashion, nevertheless builds mystery admirably. Consciously borrowing, stealing, and shaping
elements of crime fiction into a sci-fi narrative, the novel lives up to its
subtitle: A Golden Age Story.
But for a
writer like Roberts, there is a flip side to intentionally creating a novel, as
such. Like test driving a car you know
you’ll never buy, he is obviously just having a little fun with Jack Glass. The effort taken with only partial
seriousness, he works out the premises (i.e. those aforementioned ideas to be
unpacked nicely) with care, but doesn’t invest the same commitment to other
aspects. For starters, the prose is
inconsistent. At times playing with
older styles, at others he lets his own take over. Diana’s voice is regular and regulated, but
the prisoners in the opening section speak in a fashion that does not belie
their actions—Roberts their puppeteer.
Secondly, the conclusion is disappointing. An umbrella story involving the solar system
at large weaving its way through the three sections, Roberts does not resolve a
situation that had been building the whole book, choosing instead to leave
those matters open. This is all fine and
dandy, but why then devote so much narrative space to it in a plot-centric
novel? And the note he does choose to
end the story on—a Chandler-esque, Casablanca-esque note, lacks
conviction. Now I’ll just move the
pieces here and here, they will say this and that, and voila, denouement. Granted, the lack of resonance may be the
result of Roberts’ effective usage of pulp devices (e.g. empty characters have
difficulty invoking full emotions), but it nevertheless has a perfunctory
rather than earnest feel.
In the
end, Jack Glass is a solid work of
storytelling that hearkens back to another time, but ultimately is a little fun
had on Roberts’ part. It is Adam Roberts
Lite. The stories and ideas unpacked
with the author’s trademark attention to concept, the scenes and situations are
cleverly contrived. The asteroid prison escape
and reveal of the whodunit, for example, are very well done—even if the actual
escape stretches reality a little far.
But the inconsistency of narrative and prose have a detrimental effect,
as does the ultimate knowledge it is all just a one-off in someone else’s
shoes. Once having dined on Adam Roberts
Lite (for as fluffy and tasty as it initially is), the innate substance is not
rich or textured enough to warrant seconds.
A side
note: it is quite interesting that Jack
Glass is Roberts’ most successful book from an award perspective. (I don’t know about sales figures, but I’d
guess there is some corollary.)
Nominated for three and winning two (the Campbell Memorial and BSFA), it
is by far the most recognized of Roberts’ works, but certainly not his
best. It may be that the prior works
aggregated into an awareness that Jack
Glass reaped the benefits of, but it would seem to me the utilization of
familiar story motifs, storytelling methods, accessible characters, and
outright desire to produce something more mainstream are what gave it
recognition over his more thoughtful and original Salt, New Model Army, and
Gradisil. (Between those three novels, there are only
four award nominations and no wins.) I
see the same thing happening with Ian McDonald’s The Dervish House. It is an incredibly accessible novel compared
to much of his backlist, yet it is the book often cited as his best. But I
guess the message on the American speculative fiction award front these days is already clear: if it wins, it's sure to be user-friendly...
I LOVE this book! I've heard a lot of people say those things about the ending, but I can't say I noticed them. :) I haven't read any of his other books yet, but I've been meaning to for ages... Glad to hear they're a bit heavier, because I think I'll like that too.
ReplyDeleteIf you come across a copy of Salt by Roberts, you might pick it up. It's got all the cool stuff that make science fiction what it is, plus some nice interplay of anarchy and totalitarianism.
DeleteWill do, thanks!
Delete