The 60s
and 70s were an interesting time—not only for genre, but mainly for the social
environment in which science fiction was produced. The New Wave would not have existed without
the social revolutions and counter-culture movement happening at the time. But there remained, of course, conservatives,
and from a genre point of view, traditionalists. Rather than veering off into atypical story
premises and experimental prose styles, they clung to the roots of science
fiction telling their tales. Possessing
a desire to incorporate both prior and currents aspects into his fiction,
Christopher Priest’s first novel Indoctrinaire
appeared on the scene in 1971. A fence
rider, the novel is as much H.G. Wells as Philip K. Dick in its dealing with
the major political issue of the time (the Cold War). History has not shown it to be an important
novel, yet it remains worth reading.
Indoctrinaire is the story of Elias Wentik. Living and working in an underground
laboratory in Antarctica, his research into pharmaceuticals is put on hold when
military men appear one day and request he accompany them for a project of more
importance in Brazil. Landing in the
jungle yet having to hike in to the facility, things look a bit strange when
one of the military men has a moment of insanity. Regaining composure and continuing to lead
the way, they arrive at an abandoned jail in a perfectly circular plain in the
middle of the Amazon jungle, ready to start the research. But things quickly accelerate to the
bizarre. Wentik is kept to a room where
a roving light follows his eyes; he is interrogated by a man whose table
possesses a large, lifelike hand that points its finger at the comments he
makes, and the underground labyrinth he is shoved into one day only confuses
rather than helps him understand his surrounds.
The final straw being told he is 200 years in the future, Wentik’s goal
becomes escape from the circular plain.
But where to?
Told in
three parts, Indoctrinaire plots the
course of Wentik as he works his way through bizarre conditions at the jungle
jail to beyond. The classic British
gentleman of genre (educated man trapped in a situation he has only his wits
and occasional left hook to combat), his plight grabs the attention. And though Priest leads the story in a highly
surreal direction, a rational explanation awaits at the end—at least as far as
sci-fi is concerned. Intended to
metaphorically capture the subtle undercurrents of nuclear threats of post-WWII,
there is some pretension in how the plot is resolved. Like Wells before him, Priest utilizes the
time travel device for political commentary, though, given the strangeness which
overrides Wentik’s time in the jail and after, it will take some parsing out on
the reader’s behalf to see how the pieces align upon the denouement.
As such, Indoctrinaire is obviously the work of a
young Christopher Priest. His narratives
since becoming more sublime and focused, at times the quantity of ideas in Indoctrinaire feels like a new writer
laying things on too thick—attempting to make things more complicated than they
need to be toward dreams for a grand statement.
There are certainly many writers who have yet to produce such an
accomplished novel, it’s only in comparison to what came after from Priest the
statement can be made. As to the
relevancy of the novel’s ultimate message, well, the Cold War has since
fizzled, but nuclear weapons and threats remain…
In the
end, Indoctrinaire is a book that
intrigues for the mystery of the prison, and goes on to become relevant for its
conclusion in obscure fashion. Priest
writes in a sustained, deceptively casual voice that captures the same surreal
atmosphere of writers like Philip K. Dick for much of the narrative, but
eventually finds its way into concrete terms in perpetuating the political
agenda. The two not always congruous,
there are times pretension overtakes quality and unnecessary complexity
undermines a definitive statement. But again,
an engaging read but not a novel for the ages.
I enjoyed this review - its the kind which does make you want to track down a copy of the book. I absolutely love Priest's work - what I've read of it, which isn't everything (yet), so I'm yet to venture into his early works (or anything pre-Affirmation for that matter). If we can get some of that time travel he talks of then maybe I'll find the time!
ReplyDeleteFirstly, glad you enjoyed the review, and secondly, good luck tracking down his earlier work. Regardless of whether it is good or bad in the context of his own oeuvre, it is miles better than a lot of genre rubbish.
ReplyDelete