In today’s cultural climate, Colson Whitehead’s 2016 The Underground Railroad is a difficult
book to trust reviews of. Many on the
left are likely to blindly champion the book simply because it addresses race,
while many on the right are likely to be equally blind, but out of a desire to
distance themselves from race discussion.
Equally distrustful of both sides, I hope this review falls in the middle.
Cora is a young woman raised as a slave in Georgia in the mid-1800s
at the start of The Underground Railroad. Owned by a misanthrope who beats, rapes, kills,
sells at will, and in general mistreats his slaves as he pleases, Cora’s
upbringing is about as bad as we can imagine slavery to be. And she becomes a little crazy for it. Approaching womanhood finds Cora living alone,
her fellow slaves wanting no part of her personal life. But an opportunity to escape arises, and Cora
jumps at it. Catching a ride on the
underground railroad out of the plantation, she discovers worlds she never knew
existed—for slightly better and worst.
A novel of alternate histories (emphasis on the plural), the
fantastical underground railroad takes
Cora to a couple of settings, with Whitehead focusing on political environment,
social norms, and race perception. One setting
is a semi-emancipated South Carolina circa the early 1900s (blacks are owned by
the government, but given freedom in society, housing, medical care, jobs,
etc.) and the other is a tyrannical North Carolina ruled by white ultra-conservatives
(blacks are killed on sight and most whites are indentured by a despot). These two settings, as well as some other
experiences, give Cora a coupld alternate perspectives of freedom.
But while Cora’s travels eventually take her beyond the borders
of the tyrannical North Carolina, there remain only two alternate histories
explored. I point this out as it’s key
to contextualizing Whitehead’s agenda, namely in what isn’t presented/imagined as
another setting. Firstly, there is no
alternate world paralleling the 21st century socio-racial situation (i.e. nothing
show how race and civil rights exist today) that could act as a contemporary
comparison to Cora’s slave experience. Secondly,
where Whitehead presents the worst of all possible worlds for blacks in the
North Carolina setting, there is no presentation of the best of all worlds in
another setting. There is no alternate
world wherein equality, justice, self-determination, social harmony, and the
other hallmarks of true civilization exist—the other side of the coin, as it
were. Given this, it’s highly likely
that Whitehead was attempting to parallel the racial situation in America today
with the historical situation.
Given this, it’s difficult to argue Whitehead has
accomplished his goal. Racism for
certain still exists in society today, but looking at the numerous successful
black entrepreneurs who have risen in business world the past half-century, the
number of black civic unions, Affirmative Action, the growing number of black
millionaires, the increase of interracial marriages and families, the rise of
the black middle class, not to mention the election and re-election of a black
president, we’re living in a situation that is not analogous to anything in
American history. Again, racism still
exists (Dylan Roof, Walter Scott, etc.), but there has been undeniable
progression in the systemic handling of race, something which The Underground Railroad would seek to
paint out of its pictures. As a result,
the book makes for only a partial mirror to current reality. What the majority represents is, in fact, a backwards-looking
narrative. After all, how can the novel
spark discussion on eliminating what remains of racism when a contemporary
analog is lacking?
From a prose perspective, The Underground Railroad is serviceable; Whitehead tells his story
in straight-forward language with few frills or idiosyncrasies, nothing to
praise or denigrate. And this feeds into
character presentation: likewise average.
Sympathy is built for Cora given the atrocities she endures, but as a
character she is only partially developed.
Had Whitehead kept her at a distance in the narrative, her representation of racial concerns might have had stronger
impact (i.e. greater universal applicability). Or, had she been developed into a fuller, more human character, likewise she might have drawn
stronger connection with the reader. By taking the middle
road, Whitehead leaves both sides hanging, and fails to match story agenda
with characterization. And the novel’s
structure dissolves into a semi-jumbled mess in its latter third that distracts
from any momentum, but I critique too much…
In the end, The
Underground Railroad is a disappointing novel. Aside from reminding the current generation of
the injustices and horrors of slavery, finding germane contemporary value for society is difficult
considering Whitehead has approached racial issues in America today like
a frog from the bottom of a well. Not unlike the penchant among some Israeli writers for rehashing the Nazi
horrors of WWII to little modern, relevant purpose or some Chinese writers
endlessly replaying Japanese atrocities in WWII to no constructive end, The Underground Railroad likewise feels
a narrative emphasizing past horrors with little to no progressive view on the
issue as it stands in the 21st century. Such fiction sells for drama, and does its job reminding society of history that should not be repeated, but from a political point of view fails to address how things currently stand. When set aside Octavia Butler’s Kindred, a novel which likewise brings to life the horrors of
slavery in a sci-fi medium yet applies a progressive message regarding modern
race relations, it makes The Underground
Railroad look anachronistic (Kindred
was written in the 80s, mind you), however. So,
do yourself a favor and read Octavia Butler’s Kindred. (Then go read Noam
Chomsky’s Profit over People. It should open your eyes to the fact that what
is often perceived as racism in the current state of US politics and culture,
is largely oppression of a grander import: the few over the many, regardless of race. Just ask Obama.)
Great, great review.
ReplyDeleteThanks
Delete