I’ve read statements claiming H. G. Wells is the father of science
fiction, and there does appear a degree truth in it. Certainly other writers had taken steps, most
notably Jules Verne with his voyages
extraordinaires, but it was Wells who latched onto the ideological potential
of the genre and began writing stories.
Seeming to spawn a sub-genre with each book published, The War of the Worlds looks at
humanity’s reaction to an alien invasion; The
Invisible Man deals with identity problems; The Island of Dr. Moreau tackles biological modification; and The First Men in the Moon is a very
early look at lunar life. Each book a
vehicle for his political agenda, these and other of the author’s works employ
what are now standard sci-fi motifs to expound upon sociopolitical concepts. Wells’ debut in long form, the 1898 novella The Time Machine, is one such book.
The Time Machine
is a foremost frame story. It opens from
the point of view of an unnamed narrator at a dinner party hosted by a person
called simply the Time Traveler. Amongst
the group sit men of learning—a medical doctor, psychologist, and others—who listen
as the Time Traveler expounds upon dimensional physics, interest and discord arising
in the discussion’s wake. After demonstrating
with a small time machine to the disbelief of some and amazement of others, the
Time Traveler invites the group to return the following week, hoping to be able
to report on a larger machine he has been constructing. When the guests return, they find the Time
Traveler strangely absent from his home.
But soon enough he emerges from the shop. Weary in body, clothes in rags, and feet
bloody through the socks, he begins the narrative of his adventure in time.
It is thus the Time Traveler’s story which forms the bulk of
the narrative. Traveling thousands of
years into the future, truly an adventure it is. I will let the reader discover it on their
own, but suffice to say the version of existence he encounters bears some resemblance
to our own, but by and large significant developments have altered the scene in
eerie, unsettling fashion. Wells using
the setup to present his political agenda, action is interspersed with
philosophizing until such time the reason the Time Traveler has come to look so
ragged is fully explained.
Wells was a socialist, and the ideology’s fingerprints are
all over the story. The Time Traveler having
an interesting story to tell on one hand, on the other his adventure makes some
very deep assumptions about the political direction of Western civilization in
Wells’ time, particular with regard to the organization of industrial labor. Obviously intended as a warning, the scene described
is at times shocking. Thus, like George
Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four and
Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, The Time Machine uses a mirror in the
future to reflect today—or at least Wells’ day.
Though still not ideal, many of the social ills Wells identifies have
straightened themselves out to some degree, human rights taking small but
significant steps in the time between. In
non-Western industrialized countries, however, Wells’ warning remains fully relevant.
Written in the style of the time, The Time Machine features a direct, expository narrative that takes
the time to fill the reader in on the minutiae of the scene at hand. Given it’s also a first person narrative
wherein the Time Traveler is addressing his dinner guests, the reader is subsequently
the object of the theorizing and scene setting as he attempts to decipher his
surroundings. Mystery the bait, the Time
Traveler describes the curious predicaments as they happened to him one at a
time, giving the reader the sensation of having an inexplicable world unveiled
before them, answers slow but steady in coming.
In the end, The Time
Machine is a time travel parable that uses the trope to comment upon the
state of labor in Wells’ era. Though able
to be appreciated as an adventure alone, readers should still be prepared for doses of
philosophizing, particularly with regard to socio-political ideology. Ignoring the paradoxes much of time travel
literature focuses on, the novella is a cautionary. Written in a highly descriptive style, Wells
tells a story that has faded some in the century that has passed since its
publishing, but is still able to be enjoyed.
But perhaps more than anything, The
Time Machine set the tone for the myriad of time travel stories that
followed. (See here
for that myriad and be amazed at the variety of quality.) Thus readers looking for classics in the
genre will do well to pick up this novella, as alongside Verne, Robert Louis Stevenson and Arthur Conan Doyle, Wells is one of the great pioneers in the
field. I’m uncertain whether Yevgeny Zamyatin
read Wells, nevertheless there remain significant parallels between We and The Time Machine, the former easily able to be a new perspective on
the latter. It is almost certain, however,
that Orwell and Huxley had read the novella given that both were heir apparent
to his usage of the genre.
Thanks for the interesting commentary! I read this book a long time ago and didn't notice the sociological ideology. I'm eager to re-read it now that I'm more aware of Wells' viewpoints. I've read a few of his short stories (as well as Invisible Man) recently, and plan on re-reading the rest of his novels.
ReplyDeleteHow was The Invisible Man?
Delete