One day, with nothing better to read, I
grabbed a copy of Clive Cussler’s Lost
City from my girlfriend’s bookshelf.
She said she’d bought it to improve her English, and after having a look
at the cover and reading the blurb on the back, I thought that might be the
book’s only use. I held hope for something
better, but was disappointed: my first impression rang truer than true.
Lost
City
is exactly the kind of novel Ursula Le Guin discusses in her book Language of the Night as having
disconnected itself from the mythic mode of storytelling it so desperately
wants to be a part of. Its premise of an
aging but tough hero fighting against an aristocracy trying to win both the
arms race and find immortality has all the right parts and symbols, but yet
completely lacks storytelling depth to bind them cohesively. The description of the hero, Kurt Austin,
runs as follows and serves as a good introduction to the verve of the book:
The
man was husky in build, with shoulders like twin battering rams. Exposure to sun and sea had bronzed the
rugged features that were bathed in the soft orange light from the instrument
panel, and bleached the pale, steely gray hair almost to the color of
platinum. With his chiseled profile and
intense expression, Kurt Austin had the face of a warrior carved on a Roman
victory column. But the flinty hardness
that lay under the burnished features was softened by an easy smile, and the
piercing coral blue eyes sparkled with good humor. (46)
Stereotype rather than archetype seeming
to play a stronger role (I unintentionally envision an aging Conan), this
description of the main character leaves the reader laughing at his supposed
perfection rather than in awe of his “chiseled” looks.
As can be seen, it is a novel for people
with extremely low expectations for their reading material. Cheesy action/adventure,
Austin’s “flinty hardness” finds itself caught up in an takeover scheme
involving a rich family, scientific work in the French Alps, and an undersea
operation that may spell the end of mankind.
The resulting story taking him all over the globe, Austin wrings justice
from the villains just in time to save the people of Earth. And did I mention the philosopher’s stone—the
elixir of immortality—for tempting the novel’s evil? Yes, it’s all so candy cliché it makes the
teeth hurt.
And the writing, well, perhaps its best
to let Lost City speak for itself. Read the following, bearing in mind that Austin
has just saved the lead female character Skye from certain death beneath a
glacier, and the two now relax onboard his boat:
She walked over to the rail and stared off
at the ice field. Sensing her change in
mood, Austin put his arm around her shoulders.
“Are you alright?”
“It was so peaceful underwater. Then we surfaced and I saw the glacier.” She
shuddered. “It reminded me that I almost died under that thing.”
Austin studied the troubled expression in
Skye’s lovely eyes, which were fixed in the hundred yard stare that
shell-shocked troops sometimes get. “I’m not a shrink, but I’ve always found it
helpful to confront my demons,” he said, “let’s go for a boat ride.”
The unexpected expression seemed to bring
her back to reality. “Are you serious?”
“Grab a couple of bagels and a thermos of
coffee from the mess and I’ll meet you at the skiff. I like my bagel with raisins, by the way.”
(141)
Nothing says romance like raisin bagels.
In the end, Lost City is cliché in all aspects, does nothing to advance
literature, and is pulp fit to be pulped.
The prose is stale, blatantly imitative, and overworked with adjectives.
Overtly borrowing motifs from Poe, reality tv, The Island of Dr. Moreau, and various other sources, Cussler sends
his characters through a ludicrous plot that unintentionally takes on comedic
proportions, one overdone James Bond scene at a time. (There is one wherein the hero saves the lady-in-distress
while simultaneously averting a nuclear holocaust to be unleashed by a mutant
strain of algae called Gorgonweed.) Every
action and item superlative, the ensuing melodrama effects a comedic facet upon
the narrative. The only thing positive I
might say is that its simplicity may help improve language skills if English is
your second language. Then again, it
might also put you off reading anything further in the language...
In the mid-1980s I tried reading a Cussler novel since they were so popular & ever-present. Even as a teenager I was unimpressed with Cussler's "writing" and had virtually the same reaction as you did to this novel. In fact I recall passages precisely the same as you've quoted here. Gave up after only a couple chapters. Worthless junk and not even fun in a bad way.
ReplyDeleteI try not to present myself as elitist, but this caliber of writing is indeed poor. That being said, it sells, and sells a lot more than a lot of more respectable books. Love it or leave it, low brow has a place in culture.
Delete