Of the
directions science fiction can travel, perhaps the following two are the most
disparate: stories with the most imaginative concepts vs. relevant
fiction. Most writers in the field aiming
for a mix, problems occur only when the eyes go in one direction and the feet
the other. Clifford Simak’s 1977 novella
“Auk House” is one such example.
At the
outset of “Auk House”, David Latimer is seeking a house to rent for the
summer. Trolling the shores of Cape Cod,
he comes to a large colonial with a “For Rent or Sale” sign and inquires at the
local realtor’s office. Given the key to
have a look, he finds the house a touch too big for his personal needs but
entirely suitable for the series of paintings he has in mind. When walking back to his car to talk with the
realtor, however, things take a turn for the strange: his car is missing. Returning to the house to gather his wits,
things turn even stranger: a butler is on hand, and a spread of food awaits in
the dining room, complete with guests.
Dazed, Latimer settles in for a bowl of soup and starts asking
questions.
Such
strangeness only the beginning, “Auk House” goes on to twist the science fantasy
dial until the real world is left far, far behind. A handful of major genre tropes jammed into
the sixty-five page novella, the storyline requires an escalating suspension of
disbelief to engage with as Latimer is taken further from reality one massive
step at a time, culminating on a note for which reality (and relativity) is but
a dot on the horizon.
The main
strength of realist fiction is the ability to directly portray the human
condition. Empathy and understanding are
inherently much closer to being implicit than with speculative fiction. It is thus that Simak’s aims are
muddled. Desiring a narrative which
strongly condemns corporate interests, genre plot devices instead take center
stage. The reader spends more time
deliberating upon how Latimer could come to find himself in the situations he
does, rather than nodding/shaking their head in agreement/disagreement with the
political agenda. Never able to feel Latimer
as an artist, the real world disappears after a couple of pages as the reasons
corporations are ‘bad’ are glossed over and never integrated into story. “But!”, the readers interjects, “the twists
and turns of Latimer’s bizarre existence at the Auk House and beyond are predicated on corporate interests!” This is true only to a point. The last few pages completely deconstruct the
predication, leaving the reader at the heights of imaginative genre yet
estranged from any parallels to the exigencies of greedy commercialism in the
real world.
In the
end, “Auk House” is a story for which the genre devices take firm precedence
over theme. There are respectable ideas
and hints at political commentary in place, but good intentions only get a
person so far; all else in the novella lacks contextual depth; Simak’s eyes
looked earthward, but his feet moved skyward.
You get the image. This is not to
say that any refutation of corporate rationale by literary fiction has more
impact, only that Simak has deployed his speculative devices in a fashion that
distance his commentary rather than drawing it closer to the point. Good intentions hijacked by cheesy
utilization of genre...
No comments:
Post a Comment