The Mars
surface-landers, for as much as NASA and science at large was concerned with
their findings, likewise held the fascination of another huge community. With bated breath, Christians from around the
world watched to see whether any forms of life might be discovered, their
precious Bible, with its Adam & Eve roots, on the line. To this day no indisputable proof has been
found that (sentient) life exists or existed on Mars, much to the relief of Christians
worldwide. But what if Martians—little
green men—were to pop out of craters and start to parley? Undoubtedly some obscure verse from the Old
Testament would be rousted out to explain why they were excluded from the Genesis
story, and then a missionary would be sent to convert them. But what if that missionary found a perfectly
moral society—a species without sin?
That crisis of faith is precisely the crux upon which James Blish’s 1958
A Case of Conscience hinges.
A Case of Conscience is the story of Father Ramon Ruiz-Sanchez, a Jesuit biologist. Visiting the planet Lithia as part of a
four-man scientific mission, he is the only one with religious convictions, and
in the process of studying the soils and bacteria, animal life and aliens who
inhabit the planet, ruminates upon the quandaries and paradoxes the Lithians, a
reptilian species, present. The biggest
is the fact the Lithians do no evil. No
murder, no theft, no malicious acts whatsoever, their existence is purely a
logical one that has seen them evolve through various phases of simple
technology, the lack of metals like those found on Earth the limiting
factor. With the scientists time on
Lithia drawing to a close, each must cast their vote what is to be done with
the planet. Ruiz-Sanchez’s crisis of
faith determining his choice, the planet is never the same after.
Conflicted and conflicting, A Case
of Conscience is a novel with pretensions to religious and humanist
inquiry. The resulting story a mix of successes
and failures, on one hand Blish creates a wholly progressive priest that truly
feels like an objective observer within the limits of Catholic dogma. In fact, his humanity most often draws from a
much deeper well of empathy regarding social issues we are now sensitive to
(e.g. gender, procreation, etc.) then his so-called enlightened scientist
colleagues. At other moments, however,
he and the others feel like sock puppets, animated by forced emotions backing the
philosophies Blish wants to see duke it out on the page. Cleaver, for example, is far more
representative than mimetic, as are Agronski the geologist and Michelis the
chemist. The methodology distancing the
narrative from plausibility, the reader must approach the story from an
ideological perspective if they are to engage fully with the slow twists and
turns of opinion the story slaloms through.
The most significant problem with A
Case of Conscience— as hinted at in the opening—is its inability to address
the paradox of alien life and the creation story. The opening chapters of the
Bible entirely ignored, Blish skips ahead to the moral issues, accepting that
God simply left aliens—like dinosaurs!—out of the good book for a reason. Original sin (the largest sticking point, for
all the fluctuation of Pope-approved morals that have occurred over the
centuries) is instead the starting point of Ruiz-Sanchez’s philosophical
contemplation.
Regardless of adherence to doctrine, A
Case of Conscience has a point.
Blish driving the plot hard, whipping it into submission in the second
half, in fact, he ends up where he wants: ambiguity. The plot road all the more bumpy for it,
conclusion is one the reader can appreciate, and for that has survived the
exigencies of time with only a few scratches, but exceeds the unwritten bounds
it imposed upon itself in the first half.
There are more natural ways to achieve the same in fiction…
In the
end, A Case for Conscience is an
ambitious novel (fix up, in fact) that seeks to examine the validity of Christianity
in an alien setting. Stapledon’s Star Maker presenting similar subject
matter in far stronger and more empathetic terms, Blish nevertheless is capable
of hitting some intriguing chords while mangling the rest. The ending note strong, the melody that takes
the reader there is most often lacking characters, dialogue, and plot events
that feel unforced or natural. The
author like the grand puppet master himself, little happens that does not fully
present the book’s contrived nature, but does, interestingly, ring conceptually
true.
No comments:
Post a Comment