Semi-quotidian
human lateralness (with shades of destruction).
That is the (admittedly oblique) plaque on the wall beneath David Mitchell’s 1999 debut novel
Ghostwritten. A fusion of multi-cultural flavors, it spans
the globe, stretching from everyday soul to soul, telling stories that
culminate in something approximating an encompassing vision—if you squint. The authorial voice striking, the prose
bounces and burns across the spectrum of individuals—not always in parallel
with circumstance, but certainly with verve.
Clever
(occasionally too clever for it own good), Ghostwritten
is a rich meal of a novel with the occasionally empty but enjoyable
calorie. Using an uncommon approach to
novel form, Ghostwritten is less a
single narrative and more a mosaic of everyday peoples’ stories. Connected via chance and those quirkly little
circumstances that throw strangers together, the people are far from heroes and
villains. The element of chance only a
part of the premise, Mitchell seems more intent on using the device to tell the
fate of ordinary people in the context of violent history, that is, rather than
rubbing the idea of fate itself in the reader’s face. I am only partially convinced the nine
stories flow into a singular, coherent whole, but then again, life does not
allow us that, either.









