While we
debate mankind’s relationship with the environment and its future possibility
in space, there is one thing that is not in question: mankind’s domination of
Earth. Whether one believes the human
animal to be civilized or not, it has evolved to occupy the top spot in the
food chain, no questions asked. Mike
Resnick’s 1994 Seven Views of Olduvai
Gorge traces, through windows of time, this process: from minority to
majority, then postulates what may happen after. Though rather simplistic in presentation and
clunky in assumption, there remain more than a few grains of truth tucked into
the novella.
A frame
story, Seven Views of Olduvai Gorge
opens with a group of aliens as they explore Earth many years after man has
extinguished himself from the universe in an extended conflagration of
aggression—a mere 17 millennium after reaching the stars. On an archeological dig, the variegated group
sift through strata of Earth and the remains of past human civilizations—looted
and otherwise. He Who Feels is the
narrator, and his talent is to be able to experience an object’s history
through touch. Seven such objects coming
into his presence—a metal stylus, triangular stone, bullet, knife handle, three
small pieces of bone, and a chain link—it is through their individual histories
that Resnick presents his perspective on the evolution of humanity through and into
the future. Whether the story is a
cautionary or just pure cynicism is up to reader interpretation.
Literally
post-human, Seven Views of Olduvai Gorge
is a far future perspective on humanity.
Instead of humans exploring an extinct civilization, it is their
remnants being unearthed. Using the
succeeding windows of time He Who Feels experiences through the objects—from
primacy to slavery, imperialism to environmental destruction, Resnick makes his
point: humanity’s aggressive flame eventually burns itself out. I will not get into a debate here about the
nihilist vs. realist presentiments of the novella. That is up to the reader to decide. I would point out, however, that Resnick’s
views on the subject of humanity’s evolution are rather unsophisticated. This is not to say unintelligent, rather that
the ideas appear only half thought out.
Like an armchair philosopher, there is a common sense reality to much of
what he presents, but a lot of it does not appear fully informed. And the lack of coherence is obvious in the
text. The following dialogue is between
two alien scientists observing the ‘tailless monkey’ on Earth long, long ago.
"Perhaps we
should capture one and dissect it. The contents of its stomach might tell us a
lot about it."
"You
promised."
"It would be
so simple, though," he persisted. "All we'd have to do would be bait
a trap with fruits or nuts."
A coroner
examines the stomach of a person after they die, but a real life zoologist
observes an animal in its natural habitat to know what it consumes. I can only imagine that a space-faring race
would possess only more sophisticated techniques for gaining information. Worse yet, if you don’t know
what an animal eats, how can you be so confident nuts and fruit will lure it
in? Like an elephant through the grass,
Resnick lumbers ideologically and stylistically forward through the other
facets of the novella as well, mindless of what’s ignored or stepped on.
Again, this
is not to say the idea under discussion is not relevant. Though showing small signs of improvement,
mankind has yet to indicate it is in control of itself, the population spike
just one example. From an environmental
perspective we are destroying the very place we call home, and in the process
jeopardizing quality of life, perhaps even the existence of future
generations. It is thus best to ignore
the unsophisticated presentation of the novella and focus on its aim. That is undeniable.
In the
end, Seven Views of Olduvai Gorge is
a bold novella ideologically, but one which waxes and wanes from an execution
point of view. The frame story is a
great idea for the theme under discussion, but it remains uncertain whether the
science and ideas backing content are always valid. Presenting a simplistic rather than subtle
understanding of the world, the ideas of species aggression and the resulting
environmental degradation nevertheless remain vitally important topics, and
Resnick at least nails these in the story.
Hard to understand what all the uncritical fuss was about. Good Sci Fi is supposed to be coherent within the world imagined. Even in this short foray, there are gaping holes of logic some of which you have pointed out. A very bothersome one is that despite Man supposedly being extinct and the extra-terrestrial anthropologists very different with superior gifts, nevertheless the "Exobiologist" character was described as a female, killed by a bone raining blows on her head and shoulders with the bone passed off as her own. What was she then if not something resembling a human and as susceptible to head injury? And why would supposed celestial anthropologists knowing Man's development from apes have difficulty figuring out that the "dark figures" are hominids or degraded Man?
ReplyDeleteThe ideology is leftist or at least interpreted as such by most of its fans, resolutely ignoring the fact that far from civilized man devastating his surroundings as the green alarmists would have it, the environment is best cared for in developed countries. The latter have also figured out how to feed the enlarging world population while increasing the global living standard higher than has ever been known before. There are pockets of primitivism - presently Syria and its tyrant's sponsor Russia come to mind. The "Morlocks" of the world may well overwhelm naive western "Eloi" who concern themselves with entertainment more than education, polluting even science with emotion rather than sober consideration of facts and evidence.
Both the ideology and execution of this novella, really a bare outline are crude, hardly deserving of all the rewards heaped on it - perhaps an ironic exercise in what may cause Man's doom eventually - chattering classes reinforcing each other's delusions about what is "brilliant" and indoctrinated masses following like sheep?
I find it humorous that people like you find liberalism and environmentalism synonymous when they are clearly separate. To your point, to say that the West is doing the greatest job of protecting the Earth is naive. Sure, we have national parks and environmental regulations, etc., etc., while second and third world countries produce vast quantities of pollution and consume vast quantities of resources. But in what name is the pollution produced and resources consumed? Some is naturally for local concerns, but predominantly it is to fuel the Western commercial engine. What percentage of the goods you consume were made in America? Which leads to the question: would the American environment be as clean, healthy, and cheap if they were manufactured in the US? And I believe the West holds some responsibility in this. Likely you will disagree with a "free market economy" and "it's out of American hands" mentality, but the West is complicit by default. When you sell a person a gun illegally and they use it to kill someone, you take part of the guilt. In the US you cannot manufacture goods the way they are manufactured in China, yet the US has no problem allowing the Chinese to do it on US behalf. Short term gains traded for long term sustainability, it's sadly not a good plan.
DeleteYou did not state it clearly, but are you blaming the left for the "takeover of education by entertainment"? The slow, painful death of education in the US is not the result of leftist politics, its the result of financial cuts. Look at who proposed said cuts if you want answers there.
Though I have never met you, I can say a few things with certainty. You are older than 40, American, introverted, middle class, consume a great deal of news media, have never traveled extensively outside the US, if ever, and consider yourself an informed conservative. It's time to step out of that box. Go see the world you believe you have an informed opinion of, not to view said news media with skepticism - the left and right. Have a read of Noam Chomsky, as well. Therein ye shall find real answers.