For
a while I’ve been meaning to write an essay about the real ‘big three’ of the
Silver Age. Arthur C. Clarke’s existence
unredoubtable, I strongly question Robert Heinlein and Isaac Asimov’s positions
in the triumvirate, however. If
popularity is the stick of measure, then I have no argument. But if quality of prose, depth of concept,
and underlying humanism are at stake, Algis Budrys and Robert Sheckley should
be in the spotlight. While only a light
example why, Sheckley’s 1978 Crompton
Divided (aka The Alchemical Marriage
of Alistair Crompton) nevertheless possesses qualities that engage deeper
levels of the brain than the works of Heinie or Azzie.
Channeling
dynamic, vibrant prose a la Alfred
Bester with a twist of wit, Crompton
Divided tells the life travails of one Alistair Crompton. His personality recognized as dangerous as a
child, two pieces of his personality are cut out and distributed into android
minds, leaving the real Crompton a cold, placid machine of a human. Growing up to become the top creator of
psychosmells (odors that touch the lizard brain in unique, pleasurable ways)
for the universe’s most successful corporation, he grows bored being the best,
and one day decides to reintegrate his personality pieces. The doctor who
performed the surgery when he was young unwilling to undo his work,
nevertheless gives Crompton the names and locations of the androids who have
his lost parts. Crompton’s quest is soon underway, but it ends sooner than
he—and the reader—expect.
Crompton Divided fooled me—in a
good way. For nearly the entire length
of the novel I was telling myself: “There
are some great one-liners—the best of Sheckley’s I’ve read, but the humor really
undercuts the character study being attempted...” I won’t highlight where my assumptions went
wrong, but suffice to say by the time I’d turned the last page I was smiling
and wagging a finger at Sheckley, pleased with how he’d overturned the apple cart
of my expectations. Another way of
putting this is, The Alchemical Marriage
of Alistair Crompton may be the better title.
In
the end, Crompton Divided is a slyly
humorous bit of satire. To say what it
is satirical of would spoil the story, so I’m left with only hints. The subject being ridiculed a few years
behind its time (I’m pretty sure Malzberg and others have uncovered how
ridiculous the notion is), Sheckley’s view nevertheless has bite. The prose incisive, I can’t help but think
writers like James Morrow or John Sladek may have picked up a thing or two from
the novel, and become successful satirists in their own right.
No comments:
Post a Comment