Reading
the premise of Lavie Tidhar’s 2014 A Man
Lies Dreaming, several questions immediately popped into mind. Didn’t Tidhar already play literary games
with a pulp private eye in Osama? Is he just hoping to cash in again on the
same idea? Moreover, didn’t Norman Spinrad already write an alternate history
wherein Hitler was a pulp writer in The Iron Dream? And didn’t Brian Aldiss already have a discussion with Hitler
in London in “Swastika!”? Is Tidhar’s
novel really going to be such an original work?
I’ve
since finished the novel, and my answers to those questions are… ambiguous. Indeed both Spinrad and Tidhar’s novels are alternate histories wherein Hitler
never had the chance to form the Nazi party or take power in Germany, and
instead became involved in pulp fiction.
But where Hitler was the writer of pulp fiction in The Iron Dream, he is a character in pulp fiction in A Man Lies Dreaming. Wish fulfillment, in other words, is in the
hands of the fictional author in Spinrad’s novel, and in the hands of the real
author in Tidhar’s. Headed in different
directions, Spinrad achieves historical and social commentary while Tidhar gets
revenge on one of the most infamous historical figures known (yes, in the same
vein as Quentin Tarantino’s Inglorious
Basterds).
A
narrative told in two perspectives, the first-person portion of A Man Lies Dreaming is purported to be
the journals of Herr Wolf (i.e. Hitler), a private eye in London’s Soho
district. Opening on the most stereotypical
P.I. scenes possible, a woman walks into Wolf’s office needing help with a
problem she doesn’t want the police involved in: the finding of her sister,
also a Jew, missing for more than a week.
In perhaps the least logically coherent moment of the novel, Wolf
accepts her commission despite his loathing for Jews. (One gets the impression the real Hitler was
so idealistic that to accept money from Jews for services rendered would be
anathema no matter how dire his circumstances.
But I digress.)
The
second perspective of the narrative is third-person, and alternates with the
first-person portion. In these sections,
an unnamed narrator tells of Wolf’s search for the missing sister as well as
describes the life of one Shomer, a laborer at a Nazi concentration camp. Wolf’s search taking him through the vile
parts of London where he sees and experiences unspeakable violence and tragedy,
it forms a parallel to the plight of Shomer, who likewise is party to some of
the worst atrocities visited upon humanity.
The conclusions of Wolf and Shomer’s stories, however, are anything but
parallel.
Thus
where Spinrad’s The Iron Dream spins
off on Hitler’s wildest fantasies, Tidhar cuts the dictator off at the knees,
throwing him into a seedier pulp story where his deepest desires are stunted by
the circumstances of his surroundings.
Victim rather than anti-hero, Tidhar seems to revel in describing the
violence imposed upon the belittled Fuhrer (as much as the violence inflicted
on Shomer, interestingly). Focusing on
Hitler’s fears and hates, the approach is character-based, and thus narrow in
comparison to Spinrad’s usage of race purity, eugenics, militarism, fascism,
and other key aspects of the Fuhrer’s ideology. Tidhar places the psyche
behind Hitler’s hatred of the Jews front and center, which leads to:
There
are many ways to create tension in a narrative, and for more than sixty years
one common way is to portray the suffering of the Jews at the hands of the
Nazis. Innumerable books and films launched from this atrocity, A Man Lies Dreaming joins the list. Sixty-plus years later, one hopes that
presentation and analysis of the attempt at genocide would go beyond black and
white Jew=good, Nazi=bad. In A Man Lies Dreaming, you’d be hard
pressed to tell. The overlay of
detective noir more preserving this simplicity than complexifying it, the
presentation may even raise the question: has Tidhar cheapened the holocaust by
rendering it in pulp form? The answer
seems ‘no.’ But at the same time, I
don’t think anything was done to advance holocaust discussion save give the
reader a little alternate history satisfaction of seeing Hitler suffer possibly
his most feared fate.
This
review has thus far been critical of the novel, which is not 100% correct.
Given the choice of this or real pulp, it’s certain the layers of A Man Lies Dreaming make for more
stimulating reading. Moreover, Tidhar
has only improved his writing technique since Osama; Dreaming indicates
good control of the pulp form, and the ability to mold it to his use despite the fact he's repeating the P.I. mode. And lastly, it’s impossible to question the
Jewish obsession with the holocaust and subsequent desire for revenge. Given said sixty years of social and media
presence, it obviously haunts the culture, a haunting which naturally finds expression
in fiction. For my money, however, The Iron Dream is a more sophisticated,
universal novel. By extending the scope
of Hitler’s ideology beyond extermination of the Jews to its full anti-human
program, Spinrad supersedes simple vendetta.
Tidhar obviously did his research into the biography of Hitler, and his
rendering of the Fuhrer is at times engaging, but the ultimate result of his
effort lacks the depth of Spinrad’s commentary.
But read for yourself.
No comments:
Post a Comment