Regardless top three, top four, whatever, time travel is
inarguably one of the most popular plot devices in science fiction. I sometimes feel as though I’ve encountered
every possible iteration. From David
Gerrold’s metaphorical use in The Man Who Folded Himself to Lauren Beuke’s application in serial killer horror The Shining Girls, Isaac Asimov’s time
police in The End of Eternity to H.G.
Wells’ exploration of the future The Time Machine, Octavia Butler’s contrast of race perception in Kindred to Michael Bishop’s study of
prehistoric man in No Enemy But Time—hell,
the VandMeer’s even have a three-part anthology series devoted entirely to time
travel short fiction. Wilson Tucker’s
1970 The Year of the Quiet Sun falls
somewhere in the middle of it all.
Brian Chaney is a biblical scholar pondering a new project
after having just published a controversial book on the Dead Sea scrolls. Relaxing on the Florida beach, he is approached
by a government agent and given the proposition of working on a secret
project. Provided only enough details to
entice, Chaney eventually accedes and makes his way to a secret military base
where he learns that he, along with two other men, will be time traveling. Though initially told he might have the
opportunity to explore in person some of the work he covered in his Dead Sea
scrolls research, an emergency request arrives from the President of the United
States that supercedes all other work.
Into the future the three men go.
I’m guessing for a lot of readers the extended opening of Year of the Quiet Sun will be considered
‘slow’. Tucker takes his time developing
the characters, their relationships, their situation, the possibilities of
their situation, and ultimately the mystery of what lies ahead in time. At about the two-thirds point, however, the
novel takes off. Tucker puts the
proverbial pedal to the floor. The gears
he had set turning finally mesh, setting the heart of the story in motion. No coincidence, at this point is where the
core of science fiction readers will likewise also engage. (Forget that boring character and theme
development, break out the time machine!)
At that point Tucker also takes narrative structure in a
new, and I would say, successful direction—at least more successful than thematic
interlock. The shift in structure wonderfully
complementing story, it’s a pity the themes don’t congeal in more rigid form. I don’t want to spoil matters, but to say all
said gears turn in harmony is untrue.
Another way of putting this is, the novel’s engine rattles and
clanks. It gets the novel somewhere, but
certainly not in one piece; parts are left trailing in the road. But I have taken this metaphor far enough; the
ambiguous title reflects the story’s ambiguous cohesion.
And it’s a shame as there are some truly interesting ideas
in the novel. The Cold War of course
lingers, but beyond this America is on the brink of Civil War due to bad
politics and race wars (something which we see ourselves experiencing again in
2018). But perhaps the most fascinating
aspect of The Year of the Quiet Sun
is the idea that portions of the Bible are in fact fiction. Like inserting an epic fantasy novella into
the Torah, things like the book of Revelations take on whole new aspects of
potential in that context. Forget about
whether scholars of yesteryear correctly translated the original Hebrew, this
calls into question the fundamental legitimacy of holy books as consecrated
word, and whether or not we, 2000+ years later, have any right to confirm with
certainty the roots of the sacred texts millions base their lives on.
In the end, The Year of
the Quiet Sun possesses truly interesting social, religious, historical,
and political ideas that are not as synthesized as they could have been; ancient
biblical scholarship, Cold War commentary, race, and time travel are a mixed
bag. Tucker gives every indication of
how they should interlock in the novel, but the execution is not enough to
deliver a gestalt package. Prose is
nicely dense and limits what could have been a 500 page novel to roughly 250
pages (though there are some eye-rolly bits of immature sexuality). Ultimately it is what James
Harris says it is: “It’s too quiet
for lovers of loud adventure fiction, and it’s too active for literary quiet”,
meaning it’s a middling book.
No comments:
Post a Comment