Despite the disappointment of The Well of Ascension, the premise established in The Final Empire was entertaining enough
to at least attempt the third and final volume, The Hero of Ages
(2008). While re-focusing the Mistborn narrative and, to some degree,
offering a satisfying conclusion, the faults of the series continue to take center stage.
Sanderson’s blanket of exposed nuance and redundant statements ad nauseum (i.e. the continual
re-presentation of obvious elements and prior plot events, i.e. continually
telling not showing, i.e. padding the review—I mean, narrative out with
spurious statements of the known, i.e. you get the point) smothers any
potential impact, creating a slog of a narrative. Knowing that in the next page or two, the
facts, as they stand, will be rehashed in detail, at no time does the reader
feel the need to pay attention. In fact,
it’s possible to read the last two hundred pages without missing anything. Sanderson repeats the salient points relevant
to the conclusion at various points, rendering the prior text essentially extraneous. But I get ahead of myself…
The Hero of Ages is the conclusion of Vin, Elend, Sazed, and a handful of other side
characters’ stories. With the unintended
emergence of Ruin at the end of The Well of Ascension, the world has a new evil to focus on, and the good guys look
to its destruction. Sazed continues his
sojourn through the countryside, talking with skaa, collecting info, and trying
to learn as much as he can of old religions, while Vin, with the newly
empowered Elend in tow, go to Fadrex city to learn more about the revelations
and mist. Dangers from kandra, koloss,
and other humans abound, whether or not the three will arrive at the knowledge
necessary to defeat Ruin is something for the ages (a throwaway line for a throwaway
story).
The Hero of
Ages, like The Well of Ascension, almost reaches 800 pages. From one perspective this is entirely
baffling: how could so little plot possibly occupy such a page count? Michael Moorcock or Jack Vance could have
written a story of such scope in a fraction of the paper. But when looking at the text, the reason
quickly becomes apparent: Sanderson fills the pages with a painstaking—literally
and figuratively—quantity of statements of the obvious. See the following excerpt:
Fatren,
the city's burly leader, stuck near Elend as he led a group of soldiers toward
a large pack of koloss. Elend kept an eye on the man. Fatren was the ruler of
this small city; if he died, it would be a blow to morale. Together, they
rushed a small group of surprised koloss. The largest beast in that group was
some eleven feet tall. Like that of all large koloss, this creature's skin—once
loose—was now pulled tight around its oversized body. Koloss never stopped
growing, but their skin always remained the same size. On the younger
creatures, it hung loose and folded. On the big ones, it stretched and ripped.
Elend
burned steel, then threw a handful of coins into the air in front of him. He
Pushed on the coins, throwing his weight against them, spraying them at the
koloss. The beasts were too tough to fall to simple coins with any reliability,
but the bits of metal would injure and weaken them.
If the leader dies, it would be a blow to group morale? Wouldn’t have thought of that, thanks
Brandon. And if a beast never stops
growing and their skin remains the same size, how can it be that the elderly
have stretched and ripped skin? It’s a
logical impossibility! Thanks for
telling me, Brandon, I missed the previous fifty-seven times you described the
koloss’ physical characteristics. And
the way you repeated the word ‘loose’ to get meaning across, that was just
sublime. And lastly, let me get this
straight, if I shoot bits of metal at creatures but don’t kill them, it will
injure and weaken them? Somehow it
doesn’t quite fit…
Yes, I’m a weak man; I have resorted to
sarcasm. I declaimed the above narrative
‘technique’ in my review of The Well of Ascension, and as it continues in fine form in The Hero of Ages, another
approach is needed to criticize what is some of the most overburdened
exposition this side of the publishing world.
To think that Sanderson teaches, or taught, writing at a university is a
scary, scary idea.
In the end, it’s possible to read a two or three
paragraph plot synopsis of The Hero of Ages and get the same level of
engagement yet not waste hours of time reading a narrative padded to the nth degree with statements of the
obvious and reminder after reminder about the workings of allomancy,
copperminds, pewterminds, the physical properties of koloss, kanas, etc.,
etc. In the hands of a better writer,
the story could have been rendered in two hundred pages, its appeal quadrupling
as a result, as with the dross elided, the
salient plot points would emerge with impact.
But as it stands, the intriguing premise is utterly smothered in poor
style. But, there may be no escaping the story. Just look at that cover...
~ To think that Sanderson teaches, or taught, writing at a university is a scary, scary idea.
ReplyDeleteI feel this way whenever Dan Brown's name crops up. But to paraphrase the old adage, "Those who can, write. Those who can't, teach. And write."
Ha! Great line! :D
DeleteIt's quite interesting to me that long ago when the proletariat were suppressed and, generally speaking, only the aristocracy were indulging in novels, that the quality of fiction (at least what survives to this day) appeared quite high. Whereas today, when the proles rule the market, the average piece of fiction has seen a drop in quality - Sanderson and his ability to proliferate, ahem, teach his 'talent' a good example. I was born into a less-than-proletariat family, and am not being elitist, just making an observation. I would guess I need to do more research into whether or not the fiction produced, for example, in the Victorian era for the wealthy was always of such a caliber that survives to this day.
I see on your site that you are writing. Any thoughts on the state of literature today?
Thank you for validating my reaction to this 'series', I was starting to think it was just me. Everyone seems to love his books but I just cannot do it. I tried reading his first book 'Elantris' but couldn't finish (I made it 3/4) A few years later I tried THIS series and I made it to the last quarter of the last book before I threw in the towel for sheer frustration with his sophomoric prose, wooden characters and his fumbling and bumbling of 'relationships'.
ReplyDeleteI have read quite a few of your reviews in the last hour and a half and it seems we have similar tastes in books. Keep up the reviews.