I suppose
I have followed the conventional route through Stanislaw Lem’s version of
scientifiction. Starting with Solaris and moving to the Cyberiad, and from there to His Master’s Voice, The Futurological Congress, and others, it wasn’t until later I
read his ‘lesser known’ works, among them 1973’s The Invincible. This is
interesting as, in terms of genre The
Invincible is one of Lem’s most conventional. Holding to a different standard than
spaceships blasting aliens for fun and games, The Invincible nevertheless utilizes a palette of familiar science
fiction colors in creating its vision of humanity’s relationship to the external
world.
Dispatched
to locate its lost sister ship, the Invincible
lands on the desert planet Regis III without a hitch. The Condor
not appearing on any orbital scans, the crew take to ground expeditions, their
robots and tools in tow, attempting to locate the lost ship. Quickly discovering it in what appears the
ruins of a long abandoned city, investigation of the streets and buildings is
immediately forgotten when the first human skeleton peeps through the
sand. Consternation developing apace,
the men of the Invincible learn that
the whole crew of the Condor died in
what appears the onset of psychosis.
Bodies are found in the oddest positions and strange scribblings are
gleaned from notebooks and soft surfaces.
But that is not the strangest of all.
A cloud appearing overhead with what look like metallic flies hovering
within, the crew barely get back within shield range of the Invincible before a black rain starts
falling.
Like Solaris, The Invincible is imbued with Otherness. Land formations, the weather, the sense of
alien life hovering just beyond the next hill, the inexplicable fate of the Condor—nothing lends itself to ready
articulation. Despite the robot
analyzers, specialized technical gauges, and the best minds of the space
program, Regis III hold its cards tight.
Lem slipping in and out of scenes to relay crew perspective and morale,
some key scenes endeavor to break the enigmatic facade—to wrench the cards from
Regis III’s hands. Ever more drastic
methods employed in response to the knowledge revealed, or what is seemed to be
revealed, Lem hones in on humanity and its reactions to strange situations.
Seeing the
title and reading the plot intro it would be easy to assume The Invincible is about a swaggering
giant who never doubts its infallibility and proceeds to learn precisely where
its faults lie. This sentiment is not
the exact point of the novel I read, but neither is it an airball. Certainly an over-simplified view, Lem digs
much deeper than hubris to look at the core aspects of humanity—the
characteristics most of us possess—in strange environments. Tension steadily escalating between the crew
of the Invincible and what they
discover on Regis III, the climax of action appropriately occurs much before
the end such that the results may be surveyed.
The image of the Sisyphian robot and eye-less corpse speaking louder
than words, Lem attempts to quantify the sum: “How foolhardy… this ‘heroic persistence of man.’” To fully
understand this quote one must either emphasize the ‘heroic’, or simply read
the book, as it goes beyond conceit.
But this
does not mean Lem remains on point throughout. Structure wise, the narrative
rarely if ever strays from course.
Rather, the quality of not being on point is represented by the
ambiguity inherent to the elements used to present the agenda—a signal vs.
signifier confusion, as it were.
Sometimes muddling matters as much as elucidating them, the mix of
technology and presence of intelligence amongst the crew acts as an
unintentional counter-weight to what they encounter on Regis III, and in turn
somewhat distracts from the goal.
In the
end, The Invincible is a science
fiction novel that uses some of the classic tropes of the genre to dig at
xenophobia and humanity’s instincts in its relationship with Otherness. Mighty spaceships, distant planets, and
strange alien encounters gloss the surface while beneath Lem looks to examine
the fusebox and wiring which leads mankind to interact the way it does with what
it does not know or understand. Not Lem’s
greatest work in terms of focus, it nevertheless goes beyond conventional genre
to touch upon some interesting and thought-provoking ideas.
A side
note for MPorcius, the version of The Invincible I read was Ace Science
Fiction Special 4. Lauding such
well-known authors as Zelazny, Le Guin, Moorcock, Simak, Silverberg, Dick, and
Brunner on the back cover, it also mentions a few writers whose names no longer
appear in bright colors for whatever reason, Goulart (?), Lafferty, Davidson
(Avram?), Reynolds (Mack?), Panshin, and Bradley. But of most interest, at least to me, is the
cigarette advert stuck in the middle of the book. Printed on heavier stock and in full color,
the odd side teases me with“Come for the
filter…” while the even side, complete with close up of fresh cigarettes,
challenges “…you’ll stay for the taste.” Read in that order, a proper English sentence
is not formed. This language deficiency
is backed up by a note at the bottom right which reads: “A lot of good taste that comes easy through the Micronite filter.” Thankfully Wendayne Ackerman’s translation
(from the German translation, interestingly) of Lem’snovel is in higher quality
English.
great analysis, i like how lem has the ability to transform a conventional story in something unique about the man and its relationship with the others
ReplyDeleteWhat I particularly like about this novel, is sort of humbleness it gives. First lines - the mighty Invincible, a cruiser, tadam, just like with the US movies - lots of brass and drums, here goes a hero. Yet, the last lines show a man managing to return - no machines, no techs, and a cruiser having a name, like it was really Invincible. Sort of two sides to flip the coin, and the hope it's the best we have - humanity, however errand and cruel sometimes it is.
ReplyDelete